I stand corrected.
--
~~Rade~~
2010/3/19 Thomas Broyer
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2:42 pm, Rade Martinović wrote:
> >
> > In my opinion IE6 is 8+ years old browser on unsupported operating system
> > (Windows XP now is not supported OS from Microsoft).
>
> I thought XP SP3 was supported 'til 2014? (end
On Mar 19, 2:42 pm, Rade Martinović wrote:
>
> In my opinion IE6 is 8+ years old browser on unsupported operating system
> (Windows XP now is not supported OS from Microsoft).
I thought XP SP3 was supported 'til 2014? (end of support for Windows
XP, as there won't be a SP4)
And XP SP2 is suppo
t; 35% of our customers use ie 6 and probably will be using it for quite
>>> a while as it comes with XP
>>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2:20 pm, Erron wrote:
>>> > -1
>>> >
>>> > I'm sure I'm not the only one who still has clients that
Erron wrote:
>> > -1
>> >
>> > I'm sure I'm not the only one who still has clients that still use
>> > IE6. The population of users still using IE6 is still too big to be
>> > disregarded.
>> >
>> > On Mar 17, 7:45 am, Rocky wr
at still use
> > IE6. The population of users still using IE6 is still too big to be
> > disregarded.
> >
> > On Mar 17, 7:45 am, Rocky wrote:
> >
> > > Since Google started advising its users to drop IE6, and will be
> > > dropping IE6 support fr
I agree that the IE6 user group is still pretty large. But, I also
believe that web applications are becoming to advanced for IE6.
We want to do so much more with our web applications than IE6 was
designed for/is capable of. To be honest I think the time spent
coding fixes could be much better u
work with
IE6 anymore... not that I recommend that Google (and Bing) should do
that!
Just my 2 cents
Chris
On Mar 18, 6:16 am, Nathan Wells wrote:
> Dropping IE6 support would be a really great way to fork the GWT
> project. One would be focused on enterprise applications (w/ IE6
> suppo
ig to be
> disregarded.
>
> On Mar 17, 7:45 am, Rocky wrote:
>
> > Since Google started advising its users to drop IE6, and will be
> > dropping IE6 support from its applications such as GMail, when can we
> > expect definite break with IE6 support in GWT?
>
>
Dropping IE6 support would be a really great way to fork the GWT
project. One would be focused on enterprise applications (w/ IE6
support), while the other would be focused on the more traditional GWT-
ey things (like making things go really really fast).
And when I say "really great way&quo
; IE6. The population of users still using IE6 is still too big to be
> > > disregarded.
>
> > > On Mar 17, 7:45 am, Rocky wrote:
> > > > Since Google started advising its users to drop IE6, and will be
> > > > dropping IE6 support from its applications suc
On Mar 17, 1:23 pm, Rade Martinović wrote:
> The size of the population of IE6 users is the ONLY reason to keep IE6
> support in GWT.
> If you're interested in IE6, you could always use old version of the
> toolkit. I'm saying that next major version of the toolkit, say GWT 3.0
> should drop IE6
I'm sure I'm not the only one who still has clients that still use
> > IE6. The population of users still using IE6 is still too big to be
> > disregarded.
>
> > On Mar 17, 7:45 am, Rocky wrote:
> > > Since Google started advising its users to drop IE6, and wi
sregarded.
>
> On Mar 17, 7:45 am, Rocky wrote:
> > Since Google started advising its users to drop IE6, and will be
> > dropping IE6 support from its applications such as GMail, when can we
> > expect definite break with IE6 support in GWT?
> >
> > What do you thin
-1
I'm sure I'm not the only one who still has clients that still use
IE6. The population of users still using IE6 is still too big to be
disregarded.
On Mar 17, 7:45 am, Rocky wrote:
> Since Google started advising its users to drop IE6, and will be
> dropping IE6
Since Google started advising its users to drop IE6, and will be
dropping IE6 support from its applications such as GMail, when can we
expect definite break with IE6 support in GWT?
What do you think about dropping IE6 support completely from GWT? It
would make some big changes in code and many
15 matches
Mail list logo
