In M2, things have been cleaned up a bit. The framework has been moved
out of bikeshed into user folder, thus promoted into gwt.jar and out
of bikeshed.jar file (Bikeshed contains only the example apps now). If
you're using Roo, you have to fix the POM manually or wait for Roo M2
to be released
The one half of Expenses isnt even MVP. The one you access via
Expenses.html is a hard-wired app. That is the one they were showing
at Google I/O.
The other part, the Scaffold app I believe is what Roo spits out found
under Scaffold.html. I'm not sure as to just how much of that has been
hand
I've been taking a good look at this 2.1 MVP stuff - and in particular
the Expenses example (rev 8291)
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/branches/2.1/bikeshed/src/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/
I'm certainly not the best developer/architect going round, but I like
to think I'm pretty
It exists but the javadoc wasn't included for some reason. A
presenter is called Activity. I'm guessing to make it more familiar
to Android development.
You can see the code for activities and places here:
Actually, it is on the javadoc page at
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.1/index.html
under com.google.gwt.app.place package.
It also includes PlaceManager, Activity (presenter) mappings
Bikeshed example, though clumpy, sheds plenty of light on how it can
be used.
On May 27,
From what I understand GWT's MVP classes are designed with SpringRoo's
automatic code generation in mind. As such, they might be a little
confusing for those of us who learned MVP's from Ray Ryan's talk and
Google's mvp-architecture documents.
A gwt-platform user has given SpringRoo + GWT's MVP
On 05/22/2010 09:04 AM, PhilBeaudoin wrote:
From what I understand GWT's MVP classes are designed with SpringRoo's
automatic code generation in mind. As such, they might be a little
confusing for those of us who learned MVP's from Ray Ryan's talk and
Google's mvp-architecture documents.
A
Am I right in assuming that eventually the intention is that CellList
will become an alternative to the existing ListBox?
On May 21, 8:08 am, Paul Stockley pstockl...@gmail.com wrote:
There is the data bound cell based list and tree widgets they talked
about. These are really independent of
I started using another mvp framework for GWT called mvp4g.
So far I am quite happy with it. YMMV.
It is hosted here: http://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/
On May 20, 1:03 pm, metrixon metri...@gmail.com wrote:
I think, the whole MVP with GWT thing is actually inspired by the talk
given by Ray Ryan
I just downloaded the M1 release of GWT 2.1 and was wondering where I
can find more information on the MVP framework that will be part of
GWT 2.1.
I looked around the Javadocs but did not find anything like it. Is the
MVP framework already part of the M1 release ?
--
You received this message
I've asked myself the same question: New MVP framework ? Where is the
doc?
I guess they are talking about this one:
http://code.google.com/intl/fr/webtoolkit/articles/mvp-architecture.html
On 20 mai, 10:44, metrixon metri...@gmail.com wrote:
I just downloaded the M1 release of GWT 2.1 and was
Its actually quite a bit different than what they have talked about in
the past. From a quick look I had, it appears to incorporate a bunch
of scafolding code generation, dynamic binding etc.You can take a look
at the bikeshed project in svn. I think it is still somewhat a work in
progress.
On
I think, the whole MVP with GWT thing is actually inspired by the talk
given by Ray Ryan on last year's Google IO (see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM).
Currently, there are implementations available that do provide an MVP
infrastructure and implement other patterns as well:
-
Actually I don't think it has much relation to that. I think it
originated from this:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ValueStoreAndRequestFactory
On May 20, 2:03 pm, metrixon metri...@gmail.com wrote:
I think, the whole MVP with GWT thing is actually inspired by the talk
given
Thanks for the link Paul - I'm afraid my answer overlapped with your
first reply.
I think we talk about two different features in 2.1:
first, there is the data binding stuff that was shown in great length
during the keynote and I agree that it seems to be originating form
the link you posted.
The
There is the data bound cell based list and tree widgets they talked
about. These are really independent of any mvp framework. However,
there is also server/client side data binding support that is part of
their new business application framework. The expenses application is
very different from
The expenses application code isn't that easy to follow, haven't
deciphered it yet. Even the author prefaces the nature of the code...
* This app is a mess right now, but it will become the showcase
example of a
* custom app written to RequestFactory
* UI shell for expenses sample app. A
17 matches
Mail list logo
