Re: Review of open issues

2009-12-21 Thread ed bras
Ok Chris, thanks for the clear and quick answer. I will have a look at the issues... I noticed that one was already commented by somebody.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-too

Re: Review of open issues

2009-12-21 Thread Chris Ramsdale
The status "AssumedStale" simply means that the issue hasn't had any updates within the past year. If an issue is marked as such, and you know that a) it's still an issue and b) there is no plausible workaround, please add a comment and star the issue (if you haven't already). A quick update: I me

Re: Review of open issues

2009-12-21 Thread Ed
What is the description/meaning of issues that are marked as "AssumedStale"? I see that some of my issues where marked as AssumedStale... Does this mean that they are simple forgotten till somebody report them again? Such that you assume that they might be solved in the 2.0 version? My worries: t

Re: Review of open issues

2009-12-21 Thread mwaschkowski
OK, will do, thanks. On Dec 21, 10:41 am, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > As part of the 2.0 postmortem, we discussed the importance of cleaning > up the issue tracker in order to have a better view of high priority > issues that need to be resolved in upcoming releases. You may have > already seen actio

Review of open issues

2009-12-21 Thread Chris Ramsdale
As part of the 2.0 postmortem, we discussed the importance of cleaning up the issue tracker in order to have a better view of high priority issues that need to be resolved in upcoming releases. You may have already seen action being taken as we have started reviewing, assigning, and requesting more