On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Lex Spoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is there any reason to store all correlates as strings? The
I agree that the final API provided by the Correlation type should
be more structured than just a String, but I don't think that it
should hang on to the AST
Hello every,
Just a little backgrounder for this RR. For some time now, a coworker
and I have been working on and off on a library/framework to simplify
creation of GWT applications, specifically those that cover most of
our use cases. For the most part, the applications we build involve
filling
Why wrappers? Why not have the widgets simply implement a HasData interface?
public interface HasDataT {
public T getData();
public void setData(T data);
}
Maybe I'm just not seeing your use case.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Arthur Kalmenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Oct 3 08:31:38 2008
New Revision: 3705
Modified:
changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentLoaderCreator.java
changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReplaceRunAsyncs.java
Log:
Renames
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Oct 3 08:32:40 2008
New Revision: 3706
Modified:
changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentLoaderCreator.java
changes/spoon/runAsync/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReplaceRunAsyncs.java
Log:
Sort and
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Ray Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Isaac. I think the case for teaching our Widgets to implement
HasDataT is really clear cut (especially if they also accept DataChange
listeners). The DataManager is a bit harder to justify, and anyway trivial
for
I think you're reading too much into the word data. All I'm after is a
uniform way to find out what value a widget is showing, without my
controller having to know specifically what widget it is. I think that can
be done in a minimalist, low level way that doesn't conflict with various
data
I was thinking of a slightly more complex use case where you might have full
model objects.
public class ListBoxModel implements HasValueListItem{
...
}
public class ListBoxDataManager implements DataManagerListBox,
ListBoxModel{
...
}
public class MyListBox extends Composite implements
I agree with Ian about the benefits of having data binding libraries
independent of the GWT widget library. I'm not trying to push my own
data binding scheme. My proposal of a HasData interface was to address
this point from Arthur's original post:
Right now, extracting data from widgets is
Isaac has also replied while I'm writing this. I now see that Isaac's
and Ray's suggestions are not as all-encompassing as I originally
interpreted them. I'm just stepping out for lunch now, though, so I
don't really have time to think about this properly or reply with the
thoughtfulness that's
Perhaps. What would ListBox implement? HasDataString or
HasDataListString (ie. do we assume single-select or
multi-select)?
/**
* Gets the currently-selected item. If multiple items are selected, this
* method will return the first selected item ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this basic idea makes sense, though I might argue that we might want
to create a DropDownListBox and a MultiSelectListBox and deprecate list
box, as the API for ListBox is hard to normalize this way.
However, at the same time, a more complex data binding API seems like it
could be very
If you buy my argument that HasDataT needs to imply
SourcesDataChangeEventsT, then I think it follows that Label should
not implement HasDataT. Something like HasReadOnlyDataT (like
Emily suggested) would be necessary to bridge the gap between
editors and viewers.
I agree 100%, the hasText
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Isaac Truett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would Label implement HasDataString?
Yes. HasDataString would essentially replace HasText, wouldn't it?
(As an aside, if HasDataString replaces HasText, perhaps HasText
should be redefined to extend HasDataString.)
Ray
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Oct 3 06:51:42 2008
New Revision: 3704
Modified:
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozillaOld.java
Log:
Using fall back text content for old Mozilla.
Desk check by jgw.
Modified:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Ian Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realized I should work up an example project that uses the
library. I'll get to that and post it shortly.
I've started a pretty thorough example, but the office is closing and
I don't have a key so I have leave now.
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Oct 3 17:26:30 2008
New Revision: 3708
Modified:
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jdt/WebModeCompilerFrontEnd.java
Log:
This is a better way to find the appropriate no arg constructor; in some
circumstances the original code would erroneously
The format for gwt.svnrev is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and if a real answer can't
be determined it's set to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so I'd rather keep that pattern
consistent instead of the 0 here.
As a bigger change, though, I'd actually suggest pushing the test for .svn
into SvnInfo.java; that already
18 matches
Mail list logo
