[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4764 - in changes/bobv/web_mode_stack_traces_r4761: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl use...

2009-02-17 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: b...@google.com Date: Tue Feb 17 01:57:33 2009 New Revision: 4764 Modified: changes/bobv/web_mode_stack_traces_r4761/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaScriptAST.java

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4765 - wiki

2009-02-17 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Feb 17 08:03:44 2009 New Revision: 4765 Modified: wiki/HashMapOptimization.wiki Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface. Modified: wiki/HashMapOptimization.wiki == ---

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4766 - wiki

2009-02-17 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Feb 17 08:06:02 2009 New Revision: 4766 Modified: wiki/HashMapOptimization.wiki Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface. Modified: wiki/HashMapOptimization.wiki == ---

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4768 - in trunk: reference/code-museum/src/com/google/gwt/museum/client/defaultmuseum user/src/c...

2009-02-17 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Tue Feb 17 09:09:03 2009 New Revision: 4768 Added: trunk/reference/code-museum/src/com/google/gwt/museum/client/defaultmuseum/Issue3187.java (contents, props changed) trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/FileUpload.gwt.xml Modified:

[gwt-contrib] Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

2009-02-17 Thread Scott Blum
Jeff: previously everything we shipped in gwt-dev-*.jar was accessible to server code. With the new entry point, we isolate the web application so that you'll be explicit about your dependencies.. this make it much more likely that when you deploy your GWT app to a real server, things just work

[gwt-contrib] Re: Could we create begin/end css attributes rather then switching left and right?

2009-02-17 Thread BobV
Is @noflip{} insufficient? If you go down this route, it would be necessary to add -begin and -end suffixes as well. border-begin: 4px; padding-begin: 5px; -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Re: Could we create begin/end css attributes rather then switching left and right?

2009-02-17 Thread BobV
Also, what about four-valued properties? -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r4734 - releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac

2009-02-17 Thread Lex Spoon
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 7:45 AM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote: Author: br...@google.com Date: Sat Feb 14 12:44:48 2009 New Revision: 4734 Modified: releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/JsniChecker.java Log: Fixes broken build introduced in last commit by adding a

[gwt-contrib] RR : Remove explicit @SingleJsoImpl annotation requirements

2009-02-17 Thread BobV
This branch removes the @SingleJsoImpl annotation in favor of having the compiler and hosted-mode simply infer the one-JSO-implementation-of data. The new rule for JSO types implementing interfaces with methods is: - The methods in an interface may be implemented by zero or one JSO subtypes.

[gwt-contrib] RR: update Eclipse project files for newer JDT

2009-02-17 Thread Lex Spoon
The change looks obvious, but I can't trivially test them. Can anyone who uses the Eclipse project files test this patch and verify that they work for at least one platform? A good test would be that, in trunk, the cast in LongFromJSNIChecker at line 196 is necessary: // It's just a

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r4734 - releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac

2009-02-17 Thread Scott Blum
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote: The underlying problem is most likely version skew. Newer JDT's have a method that returns a wider type than it used to. The probable cause of that skew is that the Eclipse project files still point at an older JDT. I have

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: update Eclipse project files for newer JDT

2009-02-17 Thread Scott Blum
Sorry, didn't see this thread, I just put in a change to 1.6 to update those files. On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote: The change looks obvious, but I can't trivially test them. Can anyone who uses the Eclipse project files test this patch and verify that they

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: update Eclipse project files for newer JDT

2009-02-17 Thread Lex Spoon
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: Sorry, didn't see this thread, I just put in a change to 1.6 to update those files. Excellent, that's even better. -Lex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r4734 - releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac

2009-02-17 Thread Lex Spoon
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote: That is indeed the problem. But there's no reason to not update the Eclipse projects.. they should always reflect the state of the ant build files, and ideally would be updated together in a single commit. I committed a fix