+1 DataBinding Validation
Matteo
On 17 dic, 02:47, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see SuggestBox get a little love. For example:
+1 for Databinding Validation
+1 for a nice DataGrid
+1 for nicer widgets
On Dec 17, 10:09 am, Matteo matteo.fiande...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 DataBinding Validation
Matteo
On 17 dic, 02:47, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see SuggestBox get a little love. For example:
Version 2.0 tackled nearly all problems I had with GWT. Here is the
rest that keeps me from being fully productive with it:
- bidirectional UIBinder with mini expression language to completely
remove programmatic UI, e.g.:
MyWidget.java:
class MyWidget extends DataboundComposite{
public
+1 to widget improvements
+1 to removing listeners - though this is a breaking change on a minor
release?
+1 to bug fixes - all bugs, especially the ones I've starred :)
+1 to data binding + validation
On Dec 17, 5:28 am, DanielK dkim...@googlemail.com wrote:
Version 2.0 tackled nearly all
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_
of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity.
- incubator clean up and perhaps splitting it into multiple projects?
GWT 2.0 release is awesome, thanks
Ability to wire a set of related many entities in the data binding
declaration.
For example, an Account entity. An Account has a set of related many
AccountAddress entities.
The data-binding framework should be able to map these
AccountAddress entities to a set of nested form control groups
1) Databinding a la Adobe Flex (they have *by far* the best solution[1] I've
seen in all these toolkits). The GWT1.6 'HasValue' interface is a good starting
point for this, hopefully it mixes well with UiBinder.
2) Scala compiler!
3) Make Compiler commandline options available to the
Hey everyone,
I just noticed that the DTD used in the GWT modules generated by the
GEP is incorrect. It points to
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.0.0/distro-source/core/src/gwt-module.dtd
which doesn't exist. Looks like the fix would be pretty easy though,
just create a 2.0.0
Reviewers: bobv,
Description:
Some servlet containers throw an NPE on servlet.log(message, (Throwable)
null) Since the spec doesn't really say what should happen in this case,
we should call servlet.log(message) instead, just to be safe.
Please review this at
+1 nice datagrid
+1 remove deprecated listeners
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
- remove actual UiBinder limitations
- supports printing using css media (so wrap themes around a @media
screen)
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
hi,
here is my wishlist:
+1 UiBinder WYSIWYG Eclipse plugin
+1 DataBinding Validation
+1 DataGrid
+1 multiple window management framework
(forground/background like gwt-mosaic windowpanel (zIndex based),
docking, maximize, etc ...)
time
--
Here are the enhancements I would like to have in GWT :
* incremental compilation to have the same ease of use than with php
or jsp ; we have for instance an internal application where we have
merged php and gwt, and (from the ease of modification point of view)
it is always simpler to make a
-A nice DataGrid (maybe an improvement of the one in the incubator
which works nice).
-Improve change-compile-refresh development experience (like Brad
Leupen said)
-Support (plugin) for an IDE other than eclipse (Netbeans, Idea) would
be nice.
GWT 2.0 rocks. Keep up the good work.
--
Here are the enhancements I would like to have in GWT :
* incremental compilation to have the same ease of use than with php or jsp
; we have for instance an internal application where we have merged php and
gwt, and (from the ease of modification point of view) it is always simpler
to make a
Hi
I'm migrating some nice HTML-fragment to GWT. Thanks to UiBinder this
is really easy and I get a nice result in few hours.
I notice the uiBinder seems to rewrite the CSS rules according to
browser support (I may be wrong) : my CSS uses CSS3 box-shadow :
box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px #000;
+1 for Databinding Validation
+1 for real DataGrid (sorting, paging, filtering, async...)
+1 for nicer widgets
On 17 Gru, 12:06, Miguel Ping miguel.p...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for Databinding Validation
+1 for a nice DataGrid
+1 for nicer widgets
On Dec 17, 10:09 am, Matteo
Hello,
I'll make a single wish : definitely an enterprise-level datagrid
(sorting, paging, filtering and so on).
Congrats and Thanks
Jérôme
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
My letter to Santa Claus ;)
1. A real DataGrid (maybe integrate ScrollTable from gwt-incubator)
2. DataBinding Validation
3. UiBinder Eclipse plugin
4. Integrate more widgets from gwt-incubator (Spinner, Sliderbar,
Glasspanel, CollapsiblePanel, Canvas, etc.) and others (gwt-dnd)
5. Improve
Would love to see out of the box distributed compilation. We're
supporting 8 languages which bumped our compilation time to more than
45 min for the whole project...
On Dec 16, 9:01 am, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On
i think GWT must provide css api for generate the css from java code
because java code is more manageable than css (usage tracking or
refactoring)
in my idea, GWT generate css on compile, not set on runtime.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 7326
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Thu Dec 17 09:24:07 2009
Log: Fix external issue 4110: DateTimeFormat rounds fractional seconds
incorrectly
Review by: jlabanca
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7326
Modified:
I would love to see things to stabilize more than adding new features.
1) Improving the overall development experience.
- Faster compiler
- Faster DevMode
2) Improving tutorials and documentations, perhaps come up with a bit
of best practices.
- More articles about testing, how to automate tests
Reviewers: jat,
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126810
Affected files:
user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/GWT.java
Index: user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/GWT.java
===
---
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126810
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
My wish list: More focus on making it easier to build powerful and
more elegant interfaces quickly...
1. Visually improved/Less Complex DataGrid (PagingScrollTable)
2. Improved support for animations
3. More/Improved Widgets (integrated from Incubator or elsewhere)
The grid issue is huge, and is
+1 DataGrid
On Dec 16, 12:01 pm, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com wrote:
What about roadmap?
--
GWT is already really really fast for end users but speed of
development could use some work. I don't know how but speed of
development needs to be improved, specifically dev mode times.
On Dec 16, 10:01 am, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here
- Another vote for data binding + validation
- Rich datagrid component, similar to the PagingScrollTable in the
incubator
- Inbuilt support for server push (comet)
- We should be able to exclude methods from GWT compilation using an
annotation (e.g.: @GwtIncompatible). This would make it easier
Hey Nicolas,
I'm migrating some nice HTML-fragment to GWT. Thanks to UiBinder this
is really easy and I get a nice result in few hours.
I notice the uiBinder seems to rewrite the CSS rules according to
browser support (I may be wrong) : my CSS uses CSS3 box-shadow :
box-shadow: 2px
Revision: 7327
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Thu Dec 17 11:25:09 2009
Log: RFE - Issue 3906: Overload GWT.log with a single String arg
Review by: jat
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7327
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/GWT.java
Some time ago we discussed [1] inlining nocache.js into the host page
to speed up initial page load, which I find quite worthwhile a read.
While back in the 1.7 days I managed to inline nochache.js with a
modest effort of post processing (escaping some javascript), 2.0
defeats me. I can't find a
If it's the same error we ran into, it's that there are things that look like
HTML script and comment tags in the linker script that throw the parser off.
Note how we broke up the script start tags and comment start/end tags the same
way as the script end tags:
XSLinker:
var
What do folks here think is important?
+1 for faster DevMode startup.
I don't understand why it recompiles all Java classes again and
again, when Eclipse already has classes in output folder.
Plus performing JSNI code parsing and applying ASM converters
Would be great to cache all
Reviewers: bobv,
Description:
Arrays implement Serializable and Cloneable. See:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1822
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/125803
Affected files:
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JProgram.java
A lot of people are asking for a faster DevMode, is that because you
are closing DevMode after every change? You don't have to do that, you
can leave DevMode running for the entire day and just refresh the
browser itself (while coding in whichever IDE you wish, as long as
it's compiling the
Mostly LGTM, just one concern.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/125803/diff/1/3
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JProgram.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/125803/diff/1/3#newcode480
Line 480: }
Might add these to INDEX_TYPES and nest inside that block, as in
I think you have to escape the css attributes that start with a dash
like this:
\-moz-box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px #000;
You should be getting a warning about it in dev mode if you are not -
making sure you having logging on at a good level.
John
On Dec 17, 6:03 am, nicolas.deloof
+1 Databinding
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 7328
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Thu Dec 17 14:28:24 2009
Log: Fix NumberFormat to work with BigInteger/BigDecimal (using code/ideas
from
Dan's implementation), fix bug present in Harmony, more tests.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7328
Modified:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126809
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Definitely do need to escape, as you said.
On Thursday, December 17, 2009, John Huss johnth...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you have to escape the css attributes that start with a dash
like this:
\-moz-box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px #000;
You should be getting a warning about it in dev mode if you are
Hi All!
Within a few weeks I gonna release a framework. I would nami ie
GWTFromALLIn, or just Simple FormALLIn. Because I have written it completely
for developing GWT applications I would use the first mentioned. Do you
think is it a problem, or legal?
Maybe a good question, maybe not.
tnx
- Junit 4 support would be one great addition, as writing JUnit 3
tests is really a pain
- the fake DOM structures that one of the GWT talks at Google IO talks
about would be great as well (for the purposes of testing)
- removing all the deprecated classes from the trunk (DevMode still
warns about
Revision: 7330
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Thu Dec 17 16:46:40 2009
Log: Add Messages tests with BigDecimal/BigNumber/boxed numbers.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7330
Modified:
/changes/jat/bigdecimal/user/test/com/google/gwt/i18n/client/I18NTest.java
Reviewers: rice+legacy, richard,
Description:
This adds support for the above, derived from the gwt-java-math package
which itself was derived from Apache Harmony.
I think this is ready to go in as-is, and we can add to it later. The
remaining tasks before checking into trunk:
- get CLA from
Revision: 7331
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Thu Dec 17 17:06:04 2009
Log: Add missing case for multiplier with a boxed long.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7331
Modified:
/changes/jat/bigdecimal/user/src/com/google/gwt/i18n/client/NumberFormat.java
ping
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126808
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126808
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hi Toth
I would suggest not to use gwt-from-x as it sounds like you wrote gwt.
I would suggest either something dash / for gwt so it's named along
the style log4j where log is your something etc.
Hth
On 18/12/2009, at 10:11 AM, Tóth Imre tothi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All!
Within a few
Revision: 7333
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Thu Dec 17 23:02:13 2009
Log: Move more IE6 urls out of war and into resource space
Review by bobv
Manually tested on Safari, Ie6, Ie7, Mac Chrome
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7333
Added:
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_
of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity.
Absolutely!
- incubator clean up and perhaps
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- data binding and validation frameworks, which would remove a _lot_
of boiler plate code and greatly increase productivity.
- incubator clean up and perhaps splitting it
53 matches
Mail list logo
