why is com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Widget.addHandler(H, TypeH)
protected? in case I want to fire a custom event on a widget so that
the widget is not aware of custom event handler, it makes it difficult
to manage.
thanks
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Comment by carasen12:
?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?
response
entry
id14196913/id
hashe3ccc434d9840ad19204bcdfc999/hash
requestHashcarasen12/requestHash
profileUrlhttp://gravatar.com/carasen12/profileUrl
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1077802/diff/1/3
File user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/rebind/DesignTimeUtilsImpl.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1077802/diff/1/3#newcode52
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/rebind/DesignTimeUtilsImpl.java:52:
w.write( void handle(String
One of the users of GWT Designer found that code like this causes
rendering failure.
g:layer left=-34px width=109px top=70px height=20px
g:CheckBox text=New CheckBox/
/g:layer
As you can see, left attribute contains negative value.
In Java version such value
Reviewers: rchandia,
Description:
Fixing MultiSelectionModelTest to ensure that we are checking that the
correct value is not selected.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801/show
Affected files:
M user/test/com/google/gwt/view/client/MultiSelectionModelTest.java
Good catch. I created a patch to fix the test case.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1089801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
committed as r9199
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1088801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We shouldn't get hung up on the fact that LengthAttributeParser is misnamed
(ScalarAttributeParser?). Negative support sounds like the right thing to
do. Element parsers that are concerned about negative values could do their
own check for that, although it could be tricky to do correctly.
Did
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
will create RFC in Wave soon.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/diff/1/4
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/SyntheticModuleDef.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/diff/1/4#newcode50
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/SyntheticModuleDef.java:50: public
Reviewers: jat,
Description:
This patch makes three changes:
1. Excludes the client-side validation from being analyzed by api
checker. Will
remove this unnecessary exclusion once
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5566 is
resolved.
Currently, because of this bug there
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2
File tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2#newcode99
tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf:99:
:com.google.gwt.core.client.impl\
This came up in a separate CL --
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2
File tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2#newcode99
tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf:99:
Revision: 9202
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Nov 8 07:55:07 2010
Log: Cherry picking r9061, r9178, r9179, r9190 into release branch.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9202
Modified:
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/9832f30485ce48e2
This patch contains:
1. tweak for LengthAttributeParser to support +/- before value;
2. check for negative width/height in LayoutPanelParser;
3. tests for negative
Revision: 9204
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Nov 9 08:44:38 2010
Log: Public (konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com):
We need to provide at least some support for @UiField(provided) and
@UiFactory in GWT Designer. At design time we pass null as owner, so
we need to use special design time
We shouldn't get hung up on the fact that LengthAttributeParser is misnamed
(ScalarAttributeParser?). Negative support sounds like the right thing to
do. Element parsers that are concerned about negative values could do their
own check for that, although it could be tricky to do correctly.
Revision: 9205
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Nov 9 09:07:13 2010
Log: Fixing MultiSelectionModelTest to ensure that we are checking that the
correct value is not selected.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801
Review by: rchan...@google.com
Revision: 9206
Author: zun...@google.com
Date: Tue Nov 9 09:34:36 2010
Log: Modifies the GWT compiler sharded entry points to support an
alternative
method of sharding where multiple instances of Precompile and CompilePerms
are invoked.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1074801
This probably needs a README file to help users run the tests.
I was not able to generate a gwt-x.y.z.zip containing the validationtck
sample is that intended?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/diff/3001/4001
File samples/build.xml (right):
committed as r9205
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
Nice! Thanks.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1094801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
committed as r9201
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1089801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
committed as r9203
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1078801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We're working on GWT 2.1.1 right now, largely to address a lot of
RequestFactory shortcomings. I can't commit to a date other than a lot
faster than usual. The specifics are being tracked here:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactory_2_1_1
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:41
On 2010/11/09 22:11:55, rchandia wrote:
This probably needs a README file to help users run the tests.
I am not sure where the right place to put all of this code is.
This not really a sample but a HACK to run the Technology Compatibility
Kit for JSR 303.
See
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/diff/3001/4001
File samples/build.xml (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/diff/3001/4001#newcode46
samples/build.xml:46: gwt.ant dir=validation /
On 2010/11/09 22:11:55, rchandia wrote:
This should be gwt.ant dir=validationtck / if
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: jat,
Description:
Updates the reference api for Api Checker to 2.1. Fixes 2 small bugs in
Api Checker.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: jat
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1095801/show
Affected files:
M build.xml
A
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1084801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
patch updated with some mac build fixups and the public key is now
embedded in the manifest so that packed/unpacked use the same well known
URI for the background page.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1084801/diff/28001/29022
File plugins/npapi/manifest-template.json (right):
33 matches
Mail list logo
