There is no WYSIWYG editor that I know of. Because UIBinder is so new
(it's only been in the public source control for about two months), I
wouldn't expect to see such an editor for several months at a
minimum. If you see one it's likely to come from the guys who make
MyEclipse (google it).
Bre
Actually, after I fired off the email, I thought "Hey, I can just just
HTMLPanel with tables and rows and cells with colspans. Is that the
usage pattern you guys were thinking of anyway? Certainly I can write
a parser for FlexTable, but it seems it would largely duplicate
tables, yes?
With resp
I'm pushing forward with UiBuinder, but I'm running into some widgets
(mostly panels) that I'd like to have that don't (seem to) have
parsers. These include:
FlexTable
HorizontalPanel
VerticalPanel
I'm willing to write these (and any others that I run into that I
need), however before doing do
I've started working with UiBinder and have a question -- er, several
related questions...
I'm using Eclipse (naturally), and editing the .ui.xml files using the
Eclipse xml editor. Typically, or often, when I edit xml, there is a
dtd or better yet an xsd available which allows the editor to off
I'll throw in my 2￥. I see two things as untenable:
1. One incubator project with a bunch of widgets. I know it's
convenient to have one project to build to get all the cool bits, but
the reality is that each of those bits has a different maintainer with
different levels of commitment (and time
I am able to use Mac/OOPHM/Firefox3.5. Did you follow the directions
(and discussions) on this page?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors
On the other hand, I didn't use the provided link (Firefox) ... I
built the plugin.
Brett
On Sep 6, 11:07 am, c
As a long time Java programmer (since v0.9!), I'd just like to throw
in that I don't see any particular practical benefit to leveraging
Runnable or Callable. Sure, they are just interfaces, and you
could re-use them. But beyond that, especially with respect to
Callable, almost nothing execution
OS X 10.5.7, XCode 3.1.2.
On Aug 28, 9:04 pm, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:50 PM, brett.wooldridge <
>
> brett.wooldri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are however, various errors building the Safari plugin in XCode
> > which I am unable to untangle.
. If a Mac-head there could take a peek,
that would be cool -- I'll be more than happy to build and test.
-Brett
On Aug 27, 9:38 pm, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:32 AM, brett.wooldridge <
>
> brett.wooldri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > While we're on
While we're on the topic, what is the state of the truck with respect
to OOPHM and Safari? I'm running off the trunk from about a month ago
(and it's usable), but I've seen lots of OOPHM related changes go in
as of late. If I update to the head, will I be broken? Will my
existing Safari plugin
n some cases, but I don't believe it will be too
> much trouble (I'm rewriting some of the samples to be sure). I'm hoping to
> have initial implementations of Dock, Stack, and Split widgets checked in
> over the next couple of days. If you could try using the
Amir,
After your post, I have been investigating PureMVC a bit. Since you
used it, I have a question. In PureMVC, in the typical
ApplicationFacade class there is an initializeController() override
which registers all the commands. How does this fit with code-
splitting? Currently our applicat
7;t be removing the "old" widgets (e.g., StackPanel)
> that won't play nice in standards mode until a later release, so we don't
> break anyone's existing projects.
>
> Cheers,
> joel.
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:17 AM, brett.wooldridge <
>
I have been tracking the process of the UIBinder and the new "pure CSS-
based" layout system being driven by Joel at google. I assume these
two will play nicely together in 2.0? Or will custom parsers be
needed to use UIBinder with the new layout system? Sounds like the
UIBinder parsers API won
Just a question, and a comment. First the comment. Thank you for
getting this up into the repo, in whatever state. Second, it was
commented that Adwords and a few other projects have vetted this over
the past year. How does this jibe with the deficiencies outlined?
For example, not being able
You made my week!
On Aug 4, 10:42 pm, Ray Ryan wrote:
> How does today strike you? It's headed into gwt trunk, and will be
> part of the 2.0 release.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 4, 2009, brett.wooldridge
> wrote:
>
> > Ping. This not "this mo
're trying to get UiBinder into GWT 2.0. It will
> certainly be in SVN this month or early next.
> I know I've been saying that for a while, but now we're actually, like,
> working to make it happen.
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM, brett.wooldridge <
>
&g
That one is going to be tough to track down. I would start by
comparing the shell environments. You might also try running ant with
the -d (debug option) and redirecting output to a file. If possible,
make sure the directory names you are building in are identical
between the Ubuntu machine and
Not sure what the problem is. This is all I did (literally):
mkdir gwt-trunk
cd gwt-trunk
svn checkout http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/tools/ tools
svn checkout http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ trunk
cd trunk
ant
That's it. I didn't set any environment variables
Will do. When the plugin finally lands, if you remember, post a note
here or on the wiki. Much appreciated.
Brett
On Jul 16, 12:25 pm, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
> Comment by tamplinjohn:
>
> The WebKit code is current there (and I think IE as well), but that branch
> does not contai
I've read the docs for UIBinder in the wiki, and like everyone else
who has read it, I am anxious to start using it. However, even though
the doc and examples are in the wiki, I am unable to find the UIBinder
code in svn. Is it available? Or can it be made available? Rough
or not, documented
John, know any reason the new hosted mode on OS X would be trying to
launch firefox? Safari is my default OS browser, and Eclipse is
configured to use the system default browser. But the new hosted mode
console reports "Launching firefox" ... followed by matching spewage
of NS* (NetScape) errors
can download the compiled plugin from this
> page:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM
>
> (I think there's still some
> debate about where the source should go, but I suspect it to land in
> trunk sometime soon)
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:50 AM
I was curious about what the state of the OOPHM browser integration
for Safari 4 is? Is the browser plugin part of the trunk source? I
didn't see it on a cursory browse through the filesystem. Thanks for
any update you can provide.
-Brett
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Ah, yes, I understand the larger issue(s) now. I wasn't thinking
about all of the name-munging issues that would arise between
separately compiled modules. Having been to DLL hell and back in my
career, I have no interest in returning.
-Brett
On Jul 7, 7:33 am, codesite-nore...@google.com wrot
25 matches
Mail list logo
