[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UiBinder in google-web-toolkit

2009-10-21 Thread brett.wooldridge
There is no WYSIWYG editor that I know of. Because UIBinder is so new (it's only been in the public source control for about two months), I wouldn't expect to see such an editor for several months at a minimum. If you see one it's likely to come from the guys who make MyEclipse (google it).

[gwt-contrib] UiBinder Contributions

2009-09-16 Thread brett.wooldridge
I'm pushing forward with UiBuinder, but I'm running into some widgets (mostly panels) that I'd like to have that don't (seem to) have parsers. These include: FlexTable HorizontalPanel VerticalPanel I'm willing to write these (and any others that I run into that I need), however before doing do

[gwt-contrib] Re: UiBinder Contributions

2009-09-16 Thread brett.wooldridge
Actually, after I fired off the email, I thought Hey, I can just just HTMLPanel with tables and rows and cells with colspans. Is that the usage pattern you guys were thinking of anyway? Certainly I can write a parser for FlexTable, but it seems it would largely duplicate tables, yes? With

[gwt-contrib] Re: New API proposal: BatchedCommand

2009-09-06 Thread brett.wooldridge
As a long time Java programmer (since v0.9!), I'd just like to throw in that I don't see any particular practical benefit to leveraging Runnable or CallableV. Sure, they are just interfaces, and you could re-use them. But beyond that, especially with respect to CallableV, almost nothing

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-06 Thread brett.wooldridge
I am able to use Mac/OOPHM/Firefox3.5. Did you follow the directions (and discussions) on this page? http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors On the other hand, I didn't use the provided link (Firefox) ... I built the plugin. Brett On Sep 6, 11:07 am,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Remove -XstartOnFirstThread from generated ant oophm on Mac

2009-08-28 Thread brett.wooldridge
. If a Mac-head there could take a peek, that would be cool -- I'll be more than happy to build and test. -Brett On Aug 27, 9:38 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:32 AM, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com wrote: While we're on the topic, what

[gwt-contrib] Re: Remove -XstartOnFirstThread from generated ant oophm on Mac

2009-08-28 Thread brett.wooldridge
OS X 10.5.7, XCode 3.1.2. On Aug 28, 9:04 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:50 PM, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com wrote: There are however, various errors building the Safari plugin in XCode which I am unable to untangle.  If a Mac-head

[gwt-contrib] Re: UiBinder and Model View Presenter

2009-08-19 Thread brett.wooldridge
Amir, After your post, I have been investigating PureMVC a bit. Since you used it, I have a question. In PureMVC, in the typical ApplicationFacade class there is an initializeController() override which registers all the commands. How does this fit with code- splitting? Currently our

[gwt-contrib] Re: UIBinder and the new Layout system

2009-08-19 Thread brett.wooldridge
initial implementations of Dock, Stack, and Split widgets checked in over the next couple of days. If you could try using them and give me API and behavior feedback, that would be really helpful. Thanks, joel. On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com

[gwt-contrib] Re: UIBinder and the new Layout system

2009-08-15 Thread brett.wooldridge
) that won't play nice in standards mode until a later release, so we don't break anyone's existing projects. Cheers, joel. On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:17 AM, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com wrote: I have been tracking the process of the UIBinder and the new pure CSS- based layout

[gwt-contrib] UIBinder and the new Layout system

2009-08-14 Thread brett.wooldridge
I have been tracking the process of the UIBinder and the new pure CSS- based layout system being driven by Joel at google. I assume these two will play nicely together in 2.0? Or will custom parsers be needed to use UIBinder with the new layout system? Sounds like the UIBinder parsers API

[gwt-contrib] Re: UIBinder

2009-08-05 Thread brett.wooldridge
You made my week! On Aug 4, 10:42 pm, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote: How does today strike you? It's headed into gwt trunk, and will be part of the 2.0 release. On Tuesday, August 4, 2009, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com wrote: Ping.  This not this month any more, it's

[gwt-contrib] Re: Hello UiBinder

2009-08-05 Thread brett.wooldridge
Just a question, and a comment. First the comment. Thank you for getting this up into the repo, in whatever state. Second, it was commented that Adwords and a few other projects have vetted this over the past year. How does this jibe with the deficiencies outlined? For example, not being able

[gwt-contrib] Re: UIBinder

2009-08-04 Thread brett.wooldridge
. It will certainly be in SVN this month or early next. I know I've been saying that for a while, but now we're actually, like, working to make it happen. On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com wrote: I've read the docs for UIBinder in the wiki

[gwt-contrib] Re: Trouble building GWT 2.0 from svn

2009-07-23 Thread brett.wooldridge
That one is going to be tough to track down. I would start by comparing the shell environments. You might also try running ant with the -d (debug option) and redirecting output to a file. If possible, make sure the directory names you are building in are identical between the Ubuntu machine and

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors in google-web-toolkit

2009-07-16 Thread brett.wooldridge
Will do. When the plugin finally lands, if you remember, post a note here or on the wiki. Much appreciated. Brett On Jul 16, 12:25 pm, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote: Comment by tamplinjohn: The WebKit code is current there (and I think IE as well), but that branch   does not contain

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on CodeSplitting in google-web-toolkit

2009-07-07 Thread brett.wooldridge
Ah, yes, I understand the larger issue(s) now. I wasn't thinking about all of the name-munging issues that would arise between separately compiled modules. Having been to DLL hell and back in my career, I have no interest in returning. -Brett On Jul 7, 7:33 am, codesite-nore...@google.com

[gwt-contrib] Safari 4 Support

2009-07-07 Thread brett.wooldridge
I was curious about what the state of the OOPHM browser integration for Safari 4 is? Is the browser plugin part of the trunk source? I didn't see it on a cursory browse through the filesystem. Thanks for any update you can provide. -Brett --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Re: Safari 4 Support

2009-07-07 Thread brett.wooldridge
can download the compiled plugin from this page:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM (I think there's still some debate about where the source should go, but I suspect it to land in trunk sometime soon) On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:50 AM, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issue with trunk where hosted mode is a non-starter: On Mac OS X, ensure that you have Safari 3 installed

2009-07-07 Thread brett.wooldridge
John, know any reason the new hosted mode on OS X would be trying to launch firefox? Safari is my default OS browser, and Eclipse is configured to use the system default browser. But the new hosted mode console reports Launching firefox ... followed by matching spewage of NS* (NetScape) errors