On 2010-02-12, at 1:15 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
- I dislike the whole transition period followed by having to forcibly
update all linkers, unless there's a really compelling reason to do so.
In general, I'd agree, but the
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
I have a few comments, but first I wanted to raise the point that I'm not
sure why we're having this argument about maximally sharded Precompiles at
all. For one thing, it's already implemented, and optional, via
I have a few comments, but first I wanted to raise the point that I'm not
sure why we're having this argument about maximally sharded Precompiles at
all. For one thing, it's already implemented, and optional, via
-XshardPrecompile. I can't think of any reason to muck with this, or why
it would
This is a design doc about speeding up the link phase of GWT. If you don't
maintain a linker, and if you don't have a multi-machine GWT build, then
none of this should matter to you. If you do maintain a linker, let's make
sure your linker can be updated with the proposed changes. If you do
