How exactly does the svninfo task contribute to the build? I'm
still getting a gwt-windows-0.0.0 directory as output. Would be nice
to have a revision number there instead.
On Jan 12, 11:00 pm, Freeland Abbott gwt.team.fabb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've actually never had trouble getting a
I see that the rev number is inserted into About.properties. It would
be nice if this also appeared in the output directory name. Having
gwt.version = 0.0.0 isn't very useful. It's a bit annoying to look
for the rev number and manually rename the directory after every
build.
On Jan 18,
There's a difference between the release number (e.g. 1.5.3 for a release,
or 0.0.0 for an arbitrary desk build) and the SVN revision of the sources
(which might, accounting for branches and mutation, be something like
1...@4327:4364M).
The SVN version is burned into About.properties, About.txt,
FWIW, I use the cygwin version of svn on windows. Works just like Unix! Of
course, Tortoise is a great graphical client for Windows.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:03 AM, gregor greg.power...@googlemail.comwrote:
Yes, that's what I eventually did. I chose the CollabNet svn command
line client
Freeland, I believe there is a Java SVN frontend that will gracefully
degrade through:
1) Your installed svn libraries through JNI
2) Command line svn
3) SvnKit
Would that make this option less repulsive?
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Freeland Abbott
gwt.team.fabb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've
Repulsive is a strong word, but yes, I like it better as more able to avoid
mismatches in an otherwise functional development environment.
But they'd still be possible, so would we eventually be having the same
discussion anyway? (In particular, I think knorton has said he edits
common.xml to
Use the tigris (apache 2.0 / apache 2.2) binaries - they don't
actually require (or contain) apache ...
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=91
Get the zip (last download link on the page) and add the bin folder to
your path.
S
Just install a recent svn client, it shouldn't interfere. Freeland, we
could also consider either making the successful execution of this task
optional, or even check SVNKit into TOOLS and using that to power the Ant
task.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:16 PM, gregor
FYI - it appears I'm not alone in this
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2008-10/0491.shtml
On Jan 13, 12:11 am, gregor greg.power...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, finding a windows command line svn client looks easier said
than done. I've spent over an hour now trying to find a free one
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:10 PM, gregor greg.power...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, finding a windows command line svn client looks easier said
than done. I've spent over an hour now trying to find a free one (I've
got no use for it at the moment apart from this issue), and it's not
at all
I've actually never had trouble getting a command-line client, but that's
beside the point.
We can make no svn and also not compatible messages be non-blocking
errors, though as I mentioned that raises the question of whether anything
should be blocking... and if not, whether we're getting
11 matches
Mail list logo