This is actually a repost of tboryer's patch originally submitted at:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1181802
On 2010/12/02 22:33:23, rchandia wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1181802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
that's a link to this review :P
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:39 PM, rchan...@google.com wrote:
This is actually a repost of tboryer's patch originally submitted at:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1181802
On 2010/12/02 22:33:23, rchandia wrote:
Gah! I meant:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1170801
El 2 de diciembre de 2010 17:40, Chris Conroy con...@google.com escribió:
that's a link to this review :P
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:39 PM, rchan...@google.com wrote:
This is actually a repost of tboryer's patch originally submitted
LGTM
looks like this crept in in the massive r8946. In addition to being
moved, the parse method was changed from
public Double parse(CharSequence object) throws ParseException {
-try {
- return Double.valueOf(object.toString());
-} catch (NumberFormatException e) {
- throw
LGTM
@conroy, yup, that change to use NumberFormat was intentional. The rint(),
not so much.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:50 PM, con...@google.com wrote:
LGTM
looks like this crept in in the massive r8946. In addition to being
moved, the parse method was changed from
public Double
