On Feb 1, 9:33 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't translatable code generally going into /trunk/user/super, and
the subpackage being called translatable rather than super?
Those are JRE and infrastructure
Hi,
The subject of roadmap ... when will we see a 2.0.1 ? We currently
need to run with a patch gwt-servlet) due to a classloading issue
which is now in fixed state in the issue database.
Moving to a Wave would be great! I'm always waving alone :-S... maybe
I can then finally grasp why it is
We are in the process of smoke testing 2.0.1. We expect for it to be
released in the next day or so.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:18 AM, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The subject of roadmap ... when will we see a 2.0.1 ? We currently
need to run with a patch gwt-servlet) due to a
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand how user/src/com/google/gwt/regexp/super is any
different from user/super/com/google/gwt/regexp/translatable, it's
just a matter of including user/super in the classpath (which it
already is).
One
We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses. Inconvenient,
but it's not that big a deal.
On Feb 2, 2010 7:18 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand how...
One advantage is that super is
I'd hate to see even more discussions moving away from here (because I,
and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave).
Paul
Ray Ryan wrote:
We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses.
Inconvenient, but it's not that big a deal.
That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who
wants to participate, but there's nothing we could do yet to make such waves
visible to non-members, and that would be really bad.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd hate to see even
Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish
static views of waves. But without that…
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who
wants to participate, but there's nothing
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] I, and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave.
We can probably do something about that. I'll start another thread where
people who don't have Wave access yet can indicate interest in signing up.
Seems like we need a bot to publish Waves as Google Code wikis :)
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish
static views of waves. But without that…
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at
On 1 fév, 20:26, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 7517
Author: tomer...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 08:08:26 2010
Log: Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7517
Added:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't translatable code generally going into /trunk/user/super, and
the subpackage being called translatable rather than super?
Those are JRE and infrastructure super-source -- this is more user-level
code. Also, if you
John,
I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the
list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere for us...
Since the 2.0 release, I feel that there is less interaction with the
contrib list (btw what have been decided for the roadmap ?) and what we are
supposed to
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the
list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere for us...
I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that we were switching to a different
version control
14 matches
Mail list logo
