[gwt-contrib] Re: Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Rob Walker
Also just hit the same issue in 2.7.0 Using the -noincremental SDM option seems to get around it, I'd presume though at the expense of recompile speed. On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 16:25:04 UTC+2, Alexander Tarasov wrote: As I can see in gwt 2.7.0 release it was not fixed.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Константин Милютин
Hello John, could you please clarify if the issue was fixed or not? I have have the same error in 2.7. Is it related to gxt or not? среда, 1 октября 2014 г., 23:08:31 UTC+2 пользователь John Stalcup написал: We have a short list of issues that have to be addressed before 2.7 RC, and this

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Robert Hoffmann
Hi, Is there a way to see which properties cause the permutations? (I'm using GWT 2.7.0) best, Robert On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:53:22 PM UTC+2, John Stalcup wrote: I can explain what's going here I think. Incremental compile is made possible by storing and reusing data in a new

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:15:36 AM UTC+1, Robert Hoffmann wrote: Hi, Is there a way to see which properties cause the permutations? (I'm using GWT 2.7.0) When compiling your project, you should have a compilation-mappings.txt file generated next to the *.nocache.js. -- You

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Alexander Tarasov
Is it ok? 9E2D25ADAB9D44AFEFC3E887DE3E3116.cache.js gxt.user.agent chrome user.agent safari user.agent.os linux 9E2D25ADAB9D44AFEFC3E887DE3E3116.cache.js gxt.user.agent chrome user.agent safari user.agent.os mac 9E2D25ADAB9D44AFEFC3E887DE3E3116.cache.js gxt.user.agent chrome user.agent safari

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Robert Hoffmann
@thomas thank you, that helped me to reduce the permutations to one. For the record, compilation-mappings.txt contained multiple cache.js file entries, now it only contains one FC8BCE744D2BA8E0C463CE0D2F389DB7.cache.js Devmode:devmode.js ...and now sdm works. And it's fast :-) On

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Rob Walker
I'm seeing this file in the artefacts generated by the SDM compile in the temp dir. Isn't editing this file only going to apply to the current invocation though? Presumably next time around it's going to get a different temp dir, and this fill will get recreated again. Have to confess - I

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Robert Hoffmann
The mappings file only reports what was going on in the compile phase, so modifying it has no effect. You have to set specific values for your properties in the module.xml files: e.g. set-property name=user.agent value=safari/ SDM picks this change up I believe without restart. However

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Rob Walker
OK - I know I'm being exceptionally dumb here, but won't that also limit a production build to that 1 permutation? On Thursday, 4 December 2014 16:06:23 UTC+2, Robert Hoffmann wrote: The mappings file only reports what was going on in the compile phase, so modifying it has no effect. You

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors
I am really curious why this is not working for you in the first place. Since the code we added to SDM should always scope you down to one permutation. Are you still using bookmarklets? (These do not deal with this properly and should not be used anymore). On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Rob

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

2014-12-04 Thread Robert Hoffmann
It would. So I have a common.gwt.xml which a Dev.gwt.xml inherits and restricts (as discussed in this topic). The production.gwt.xml also inherits from common but without restrictions. In such or similar setup you can also keep other dev specific stuff separated, logging etc. On December 4,