[gwt-contrib] Re: Allow detached JDO objects to be transferred via RPC

2009-06-30 Thread bruno
Hi Bod and Dan, Very happy to see that this issue is on its way to be solved :) Nevertheless, I think it would be useful if JDO management code and RPC serialization can be separated : instead of having for (Class iface : interfaces) { if (javax.jdo.spi.Detachable.equals(iface.getName())) {

[gwt-contrib] Re: Misc JS problem cleanup

2009-06-30 Thread jgw
On 2009/06/19 17:30:23, jgw wrote: On 2009/06/19 01:37:23, scottb wrote: LGTM. Good catches, all. BTW, Scott -- could you please go ahead and commit this when you have a moment? I'd like to get these into the 1.6 maintenance release. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/42802

[gwt-contrib] Fix for Firefox 3.5 relatedTarget bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497780)

2009-06-30 Thread jgw
Reviewers: jlabanca, Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49803 Affected files: M user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/impl/DOMImplStandard.java Index:

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix for Firefox 3.5 relatedTarget bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497780)

2009-06-30 Thread jgw
Note that the referenced Firefox bug is marked as fixed/resolved, but it didn't make it into the Firefox 3.5 release branch (they're expecting to ship a fix in 3.5.1, which essentially means we're all going to be stuck with this behavior for at least a year or so). I've tested this patch on a

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update RichTextAreaImplSafari

2009-06-30 Thread jgw
Looks good, modulo my comment about repeating method declarations in the formatter interfaces. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49802/diff/1/5 File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RichTextArea.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49802/diff/1/5#newcode485 Line 485: void

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix for Firefox 3.5 relatedTarget bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497780)

2009-06-30 Thread jlabanca
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49803 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update RichTextAreaImplSafari

2009-06-30 Thread jlabanca
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49802/diff/1/5 File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RichTextArea.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49802/diff/1/5#newcode485 Line 485: void undo(); It prevents a deprecation compiler warning when using the methods. If we inherit them

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5639 - Removed most of the RichTextAreaImplSafari implementation used only for older versions of...

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 06:58:38 2009 New Revision: 5639 Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RichTextArea.java trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/impl/RichTextAreaImpl.java

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add Impl.getNameOf() to expose JNameOf nodes to Java code

2009-06-30 Thread bobv
Thanks for the review; the JSNI lookup logic had already been extracted into JsniRefLookup by Lex some number of weeks ago. Committed at r5640. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/46802 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix for Firefox 3.5 relatedTarget bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497780)

2009-06-30 Thread jgw
On 2009/06/30 13:45:55, jlabanca wrote: LGTM Thanks, commited at r5641. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/49803 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] Re: Allow detached JDO objects to be transferred via RPC

2009-06-30 Thread דניאל רייס
Hi Bruno - I've uploaded a new patch that's more along these lines. Hopefully it will do what you are looking for. Thanks, Dan On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:15 AM, bruno bruno.marches...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bod and Dan, Very happy to see that this issue is on its way to be solved :)

[gwt-contrib] Re: SoyLite

2009-06-30 Thread Freeland Abbott
My +1 in general. On Katharina's point, is it practical to just add a note to the HTML output, rather than looking for a code change, to the effect of some small methods may have been inlined away, perhaps citing an option (-XsoycExtra, I see in the patch? Or maybe an option to -soyc, like

[gwt-contrib] Re: IE8 disappearing history

2009-06-30 Thread Amir Kashani
Joel, I'm out of the office today, but I'll be sure to give it a shot first thing tomorrow and report back. Thanks. - Amir On Jun 30, 5:32 am, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote: Amir, I'd be very interested in any way you can find to reproduce this bug reliably. The History implementation

[gwt-contrib] derpc review: hosted-mode user code, rebind, and related tests

2009-06-30 Thread John Tamplin
Sorry this took so long -- its a lot of code. In general it looks pretty good - mostly just minor nits and a couple clarifications requested, plus one potentially significant issue. I would like to see example payloads in comments (not sure the best place to put it -- maybe in the CommandSink

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5643 - Merging r5641 from trunk (Fix for Firefox 3.5 Event.relatedTarget bug).

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 08:39:59 2009 New Revision: 5643 Modified: releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/impl/DOMImplStandard.java Log: Merging r5641 from trunk (Fix for Firefox 3.5

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5644 - Updating branch-info.

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 08:40:18 2009 New Revision: 5644 Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt Log: Updating branch-info. Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5640 - Add Impl.getNameOf() to expose JNameOf nodes to Java code.

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: b...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 07:54:21 2009 New Revision: 5640 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JProgram.java trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReplaceRebinds.java trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/impl/Impl.java Log: Add

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5641 - Fix for Firefox 3.5 relatedTarget bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497780)

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 08:01:08 2009 New Revision: 5641 Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/impl/DOMImplStandard.java Log: Fix for Firefox 3.5 relatedTarget bug

[gwt-contrib] Dynamic panel and RPC

2009-06-30 Thread 尉涛
Hello! I want know about the Dynamic panel. I do not know if there is Dynamic panel in GWT. One Day, I do RPC by opertion OnSuccess(), to make a Dynamic panel. but the panel is not show first. when Switch interface the panel is show after. so i don't know why. Like: public void

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5642 - Merging r5641 from trunk (Fix for Firefox 3.5 Event.relatedTarget bug).

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 08:39:50 2009 New Revision: 5642 Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/impl/DOMImplStandard.java Log: Merging

[gwt-contrib] Focus and Event fixes for RichTextArea

2009-06-30 Thread jlabanca
Reviewers: jgw, Description: This patch fixes a few issues in RichTextArea: Issue 3133: Events triggered by RichTextArea are not sent through the normal event system, so none of the DOM methods that rely on currentEvent work. I fixed this by calling DOM#dispatchEvent() instead of calling

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5646 - Merging trunk r5627 into this branch.

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 13:00:02 2009 New Revision: 5646 Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/RadioButton.java Log: Merging trunk r5627 into this branch. Modified:

[gwt-contrib] Allow @def to be retrieved as a String from CssResource

2009-06-30 Thread galgwt . reviews
Reviewers: robertvawter_google.com, Description: I would like to be able to use @def to define color values in my .css file but also access them in my Java code. This change allows you to define an accessor in your CssResource implementation class that returns a String. Please review this at

[gwt-contrib] Re: using string constants in @def

2009-06-30 Thread Eric Ayers
I uploaded a patch for consideration at: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/50804 On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Eric Ayerszun...@google.com wrote: In this case, I'm trying to share color definitions between CSS and my source.  I have a palette of colors that I want to share. On Tue,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Allow @def to be retrieved as a String from CssResource

2009-06-30 Thread bobv
I think the following scenario should be made to work. my.css: @def shadow #abc .shadow { color: shadow; } my.java MyCss implements CssResource { String shadow(); @ClassName(shadow) String shadowClass(); } http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/50804/diff/1/5 File

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add Impl.getNameOf() to expose JNameOf nodes to Java code

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Blum
Ah, that does ring a bell. funny, I can't actually find any way in the tool that lets you see what svn rev the patch is actually against. On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:56 AM, b...@google.com wrote: Thanks for the review; the JSNI lookup logic had already been extracted into JsniRefLookup by Lex

[gwt-contrib] Re: Misc JS problem cleanup

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Blum
I did, it's in there at r5602. On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:15 AM, j...@google.com wrote: On 2009/06/19 17:30:23, jgw wrote: On 2009/06/19 01:37:23, scottb wrote: LGTM. Good catches, all. BTW, Scott -- could you please go ahead and commit this when you have a moment? I'd like to get

[gwt-contrib] Fix a couple of tiny checkstyle problems in dev

2009-06-30 Thread rice
Reviewers: scottb, Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/50805 Affected files: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/SelectionProperty.java dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JMethod.java Index: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JMethod.java

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix a couple of tiny checkstyle problems in dev

2009-06-30 Thread scottb
1 issue, but no need to re-review http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/50805/diff/1/3 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/SelectionProperty.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/50805/diff/1/3#newcode44 Line 44: * Gets the fallback value for the property Period should go here.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5647 - Updating branch-info.

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 13:00:59 2009 New Revision: 5647 Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt Log: Updating branch-info. Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5650 - Add tests for data-collection ASM visitors.

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 17:14:14 2009 New Revision: 5650 Added: changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/asm/ changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/asm/AsmTestCase.java (contents, props changed)

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5651 - More sort format.

2009-06-30 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: sco...@google.com Date: Tue Jun 30 18:16:39 2009 New Revision: 5651 Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/JUnitMessageQueue.java trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/JUnitShell.java Log: More sort format. Modified:

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT emulation of HTML5/CSS3 features

2009-06-30 Thread Fred Sauer
+1 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:24 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been wondering how GWT should deal with upcoming new features in HTML5/CSS3. There are several areas where functionality that has been implemented in GWT is now also available in the upcoming rendering

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT emulation of HTML5/CSS3 features

2009-06-30 Thread tfreitas
+1 On Jun 29, 10:24 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been wondering how GWT should deal with upcoming new features in HTML5/CSS3. There are several areas where functionality that has been implemented in GWT is now also available in the upcoming rendering engines. GWT is

[gwt-contrib] Re: HelpRequired : GWT-Incubator: GlassPanel changes

2009-06-30 Thread Fred Sauer
Surya, In general you should be able to follow along http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/wiki/GlassPanel and just include the GlassPanel code in your project as you suggested. Any chance you are using GWT trunk rather than 1.6.4? If so, check to see you have the latest source

[gwt-contrib] Re: GlassPanelImpl throws compiletime errors

2009-06-30 Thread Fred Sauer
Surya, Also see my reply to your other email and make sure that if you're on GWT trunk that you have the latest module file which includes an ie8 rule as seen in http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/browse/trunk/src/com/google/gwt/widgetideas/GlassPanel.gwt.xml Fred On

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT emulation of HTML5/CSS3 features

2009-06-30 Thread nicolas de loof
Transparent support for CSS3/HTML5 on all browsers including IE would be a killer feature !+1 2009/7/1 tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com +1 On Jun 29, 10:24 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been wondering how GWT should deal with upcoming new features in HTML5/CSS3.