On Wednesday, December 8, 2010 9:16:16 PM UTC+1, PhilBeaudoin wrote:
Just ran into an interesting little hack today. Basically, the interface
includes a method:
public void __do_not_implement_this_interface_extend_FooImpl_instead();
I'm far from convinced I like it, but it sure is right
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1227801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Just a general comment: We should take care to make sure that anything
that's cached across a refresh doesn't pin the TypeOracle or
CompilingClassLoader (any reference to a type, for example, will do that).
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:16 AM, jbrosenb...@google.com wrote:
Exactly, this is where I ran into this.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 8, 2010 9:16:16 PM UTC+1, PhilBeaudoin wrote:
Just ran into an interesting little hack today. Basically, the interface
includes a method:
public void
Hi,
We're experimenting with editors (actually, way more than that, with more
than 80 reusable editors and 60 views that are editors themselves and make
use of an editor driver) and we have an issue with OptionalFieldEditor: the
wrapped editor isn't populated.
I can't for the life me find a
Compiling the validation sample (with ant) produces the following
warning (is that intended?):
[java] [WARN] No ConstraintValidator of
ConstraintDescriptorImpl{annotation=com.google.gwt.sample.validation.shared.Zip,
payloads=[], hasComposingConstraints=false,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:52 AM, rchan...@google.com wrote:
Compiling the validation sample (with ant) produces the following
warning (is that intended?):
[java] [WARN] No ConstraintValidator of
LGTM
On 2010/12/17 02:11:10, rjrjr wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1223802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Unfortunately not
On 2010/12/17 20:33:56, unnurg wrote:
LGTM
On 2010/12/17 02:11:10, rjrjr wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1223802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Originally from
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/1b67cfebede416b7/e958579badd4613a?lnk=gstq=pjulien+dvsDataMap#e958579badd4613a
and other posts. I've now reported
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5776
and included
LGTM
On 2010/12/17 19:43:44, Nick Chalko wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:52 AM, mailto:rchan...@google.com wrote:
Compiling the validation sample (with ant) produces the following
warning (is that intended?):
[java] [WARN] No ConstraintValidator of
Reviewers: tobyr, zundel,
Description:
Base Framework for Generator Result Caching
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1232801/show
Affected files:
A dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/GeneratorContextExt.java
A
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1230801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
13 matches
Mail list logo
