Hi,
As a maven developper, I have contributed the central repository with
gwt artifacts. I now GWT team doesn't want to use maven as build
system, and I'm fine with this. I'm not here to try changing your
choice.
I just would like the build script to support deploying the GWT
artifacts to a
I was not aware OOPHM was planned for 1.6, but in such case only jars
are required in maven repo. This will just require the maven plugin(s)
to upgrade and detect gwt version = 1.6
Cheers,
Nicolas
On 21 nov, 18:19, Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but with OOPHM in 1.6, that is no
On 21 nov, 18:40, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would also require a patch to the maven plugin to allow it to
download and install the OOPHM browser plugins, otherwise, the 'clean
checkout test run' scenario won't work. So the plugins should be
bundled as a separate artifact in
The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of the GWT Maven
Plugin version 1.0.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/
This is the first stable release after some month of real-life tests
in sandbox.
To get this update, simply specify the version in your project's
plugin
, 2008, at 9:43 AM, nicolas.deloof
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of the GWT Maven
Plugin version 1.0.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/
This is the first stable release after some month of real-life tests
in sandbox.
To get
term, I'd like to
see a sort of defacto standard GWT maven plugin, defacto standard GWT
repo, etc. Right now, everyone and their brother is putting GWT
packages into repos, using various packaging schemes.
-Ray
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:18 PM, nicolas.deloof
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
some very important features that seem to
be missing from this plugin (an archetype, running GWTTestCases from
the GWTTestSuite, etc). I too would like to see these two plugins
merged together.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:20 AM, nicolas.deloof
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi,
the gwt-maven-plugin development has a Classloader issue with tomcat
embedded
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT-14
We have no idea of what's wrong, so any of you with ClassLoader /
Tomcat embedded skills would be welcome to help if possible.
Please apologies for spaming this group for a
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade the gwt-maven plugin to support 1.6 release.
I've applied the shell / compiler changes and now try to launch the
compiler. I got a strange error :
[INFO]Compiling 15 permutations
[INFO]Process output
[INFO] [ERROR] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
Hi,
As a gwt-log user I'd like to use the logging API from gwt-contrib. I
notice this one has the same limitation I got with gwt-log : user
can't configure the server URL for RemoteLogger. As my application has
multiple GWT modules, each of them will result with a dedicated
logging URI :
Hi
I plan to migrate from gwt-log to gen2 logging API
I get a compilation issue :
[ERROR] Errors in 'file:/D:/projets/bios/bios-relation-client/gwt-
incubator/target/classes/com/google/gwt/gen2/logging/impl/shared/
ProxyServerBindingsImpl.java'
[ERROR] Line 27: No source code is available for
Hi
I'm migrating some nice HTML-fragment to GWT. Thanks to UiBinder this
is really easy and I get a nice result in few hours.
I notice the uiBinder seems to rewrite the CSS rules according to
browser support (I may be wrong) : my CSS uses CSS3 box-shadow :
box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px #000;
it in dev mode if you are not -
making sure you having logging on at a good level.
John
On Dec 17, 6:03 am, nicolas.deloof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm migrating some nice HTML-fragment to GWT. Thanks to UiBinder this
is really easy and I get a nice result in few hours.
I
The point of the HTMLPanel/Parser is that it allows you to mix static HTML
and widgets more or less arbitrarily. We've also seen that many designs can
end up with a lot fewer unnecessary widgets this way.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:34 AM, nicolas.deloof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
Do you
events to break because the widgets all see themselves as unattached, and
thus never hook up their event handlers.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:46 AM, nicolas.deloof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
You're right, this works fine
just still can't have handlers working with my button, either
+1 for DataBinding. JSR 295 support would be great, like
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-beans-binding/ does
+1 for JSR303 (validation), there is allready a proof of concept
available at http://code.google.com/p/gwt-validation/
On 17 déc 2009, 12:07, Rudy Krol rudy.k...@gmail.com wrote:
My letter
Hi,
I tried my GWT 2.0 webapp with the recent test build of IE9 and it
doesn't display. I wonder IE9 is not recognized as IE, event whit IE8
mode set.
The browser may use a unsuported user-agent ID, is there allready any
test done on this new browser ? roadmap to support its better
support for
Not the best way to help Maven users :-/
install-file goal is designed to setup a local repository, not to
create a public shared one.
Please consider writing pom.xml files with complete metadatas.
NB: providing maven metadata and artifact deployment does NOT require
the project itself to be
That's fine, I just wanted to ensure changes would be sent back to
codehaus Jira to avoid some sort of fork - we allready hardly merged
the codehaus googlecode gwt-maven plugins !
I'd be pleased to help if you plan to support some SDK features in an
official GWT Maven plugin
The codeHaus plugin
I've just found what I was looking for here :
http://www.techhui.com/profiles/blogs/simpler-and-speedier-gwt-with
Maybe this could be added to the official documentation as an
alternative to JSON and Overlay Types ?
http://code.google.com/intl/fr-FR/webtoolkit/articles/dynamic_host_page.html
On
20 matches
Mail list logo
