Out of curiosity, why not use the org.json API?
jay
On Monday, December 11, 2017 at 8:13:40 AM UTC-8, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 11, 2017 at 4:01:41 PM UTC+1, Colin Alworth wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Thomas, I'm excited to see where this will lead.
>>
I'll give that a try...
Will the issue be handled before the final release?
jay
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:47:54 AM UTC-7, Roberto Lublinerman wrote:
There seems that some assertions in UnifyAST are not being satisfied in
incremental SDM but it runs fine (and correctly) if you turn
I grabbed the RC and switched to use it from my IntelliJ project.
When starting my run configuration using SDM, all seems well until the
compiler dies (see below). What can I do to provide more information to
help track this down? (Sorry, I cannot make the code available...)
// Lots and lots
I'll speak up in favor! I'm sure we'd get a number of folks from my company
who would be very interested in listening if not actively participating.
jay
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 12:41:40 PM UTC-8, James Nelson wrote:
Hi all,
I am just wondering if it would be possible to setup
I'll try over the weekend to come up with a repro project. While I'm
working on that, is there anything I can look for in the compiler? I'm able
to build and use my locally built GWT compiler, so it's easy to stick in
some debug statements and inspect what's going on.
thanks,
jay
On Thursday
and
this bughttps://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8536
?
thanks,
jay
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:43:22 AM UTC-8, Andrés Testi wrote:
Thanks!
- Andrés Testi
El miércoles, 22 de enero de 2014 16:39:45 UTC-3, John Stalcup escribió:
Yeah. It seems
,
Jay
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT
Contributors group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr
match up any more and we get failures.
Maybe what you're suggesting is that we're doing something wrong? I'd
*love* to just do one gwt compile *ever* and have the right bootstrap
files in place. How do we handle the GWT-RPC serialization policies?
thanks,
jay
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12
doesn't
include the right permutation, you get to do it all over again.
My question is if someone can point us at how we can use our Jetty process,
but hook up the GWT dev mode magic so we can just fire up the debugger
and go.
Thanks,
jay
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit
Anyone have any pointers to offer?
thanks,
jay
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:14:17 PM UTC-7, jay wrote:
(I seem to be unable to post this comment to the code review...)
In regards to the code review posted at
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1601804, I would love to see this
land
or some more details on how the layers are
supposed to be used in the onAttach now vs. previously, I will try to take
a look and get a better understanding of what's going wrong.
Thanks,
jay
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
to super.onBrowserEvent. I assume the comment
should be deleted?
2. com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.TabBar#TabBar -- Line 201 is
first.setHeight(100%); and guess what's on line 206? The same
thing! I'm guessing one of these is not necessary.
Thanks,
jay
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google
, so uh...be careful ;-)
FWIW, this exact same code was working just fine with GWT 1.7...
Thanks,
jay
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.
I'll see if I can whittle things down to a manageable sample app.
On Apr 8, 8:01 am, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
Hey, Jay,
I haven't replicated the problem using your example, but I think I see the
bug anyway. There is an optimization to simplify at compile time
expressions like
So...as of right now, what is the *last* version of gwt-incubator that
is guaranteed to work with GWT 1.7? Is it safe to assume that it is
the version immediately prior to the removal of StyleInjector?
thanks,
jay
On Sep 10, 8:28 am, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
[oops - +gwtc]
Hi
What branch and what functionality have you already added?
jay
On Jul 28, 1:44 am, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure about the current status of when things will proceed and
move to trunk, but I'd like to see this feature in the core table
framework!
If you have some
row in sync?
I appreciate any hints, tips, and/or tricks!
jay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I was under the impression (based on conversations with GWT team
members) at Google I/O in May), that moving this into trunk for 2.0
was a sure thing. Has something changed?
I'll live if this has changed, I'd just like to know. Please...keep us
informed...
thanks,
jay
On Jul 16, 8:07 am
Is there any way, when you have a footer table associated with the
PagingScrollTable, to have the horizontal scroll bar under the footer,
rather than between the data table and the footer table?
thanks,
jay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group
Bump again? Any status?
thanks...
jay
On Jul 7, 8:40 am, jay jay.gin...@gmail.com wrote:
bump. Anything?
On Jun 24, 10:31 am, jay jay.gin...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious if the effort has been resumed? Regardless, is there
anyway for you to commit what you do have somewhere we could
bump. Anything?
On Jun 24, 10:31 am, jay jay.gin...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious if the effort has been resumed? Regardless, is there
anyway for you to commit what you do have somewhere we could look and
provide feedback?
thanks,
jay
On Jun 10, 8:28 am, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com
Did anything come of this? Alex -- does your approach work with GWT
1.6? And, have you decided to contribute this anywhere? I'll
understand if you aren't willing, but I figured it can't hurt to ask.
jay
On May 7, 1:24 pm, Alex Epshteyn alexander.epsht...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
Could you
to replicate that code. (I'm
referring to the inner class which starts on line 882 of SVN rev 1640
of PagingScrollTable.)
Perhaps the contents of the callback's onComplete() implementation
could be pulled out to a protected method, available for subclasses to
use?
Thanks!!!
jay
consideration on this...
jay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Just curious if the effort has been resumed? Regardless, is there
anyway for you to commit what you do have somewhere we could look and
provide feedback?
thanks,
jay
On Jun 10, 8:28 am, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
@jay - I got side tracked with other tasks, but I'll pick up
it
read-only, and having a MutableColumnDefinition?)
jay
On Jun 10, 9:55 am, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: Bruce's point about expectations and features vs. performance.
Has there been (or should we start) discussion for the public record
of different facets/features of tables
for writing the
kind of interactive and rich apps our users are demanding. I want to
do whatever I can (with my limited time outside of my job) to help
make this toolkit even better.
Thanks!
jay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit
I saw the initial commit of these classes into your branch, but I
haven't seen any additional commits. I'd love to take a look at the
current direction, and see what other input I can provide.
jay
On Jun 9, 7:12 am, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
We'll definitely keep these things
, please change the
signature to pass in the CellEditInfo which does contain this
information.
Thanks,
jay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Just a thought here... Perhaps the CellEditInfo class could be
enhanced to add:
* The original value (before the edit started)
* The proposed new value
This would give the setCellValue() method access to the complete
information about the edit.
thanks again,
jay
On Jun 4, 12:09 pm, jay
ArrayListRowType( getRowValues() );
setData( getAbsoluteFirstRowIndex(), rows.iterator() );
}
This does the trick (especially as it does not require that I go back
to the server for the data!). However, is this the best way?
Thanks,
jay
width.
jay
On May 7, 6:08 pm, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
If you want the columns to be an exact size, set the minimum and maximum
column widths and call resetColumnWidths() or set the resize policy to
FIXED.
The preferred width is exactly that, the width that the columns should
I've entered issue #3648 --
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3648.
thanks!
jay
On May 11, 1:30 pm, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, that is what you're doing. Sorry for my failure at reading
comprehension. :)
I can certainly see why you would have
the event, it checks to see
if the sortedColumnTrigger member is null. In this case, it is,
because the only way for that (private) member to be set is in
reaction to a ONMOUSEUP event.
What's the best way to resolve this? Should I file a bug? Submit a
patch? Something else?
thanks,
jay
= getHeaderTable().getFlexCellFormatter
().getElement( 0, sortList.getPrimaryColumn() );
applySortedColumnIndicator( headerElem, sortList.isPrimaryAscending
() );
}
jay
On May 7, 12:10 pm, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jay,
That does sound like a bug. Opening an issue in the tracker
is to have the PagingScrollTable just work. I'll be the first
to admit that what I consider just working may not work for
others...)
thanks,
jay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Is this the best forum for providing feedback on these widgets? (I've
looked high low, and found nothing better, but it's entirely
possible I've managed to miss the obvious ;-)
thanks!
jay
On May 1, 7:03 am, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
We do expect to start moving a cluster
graduates. I guess, more particularly, what is
holding back the current set of table widgets from graduating into the
trunk?
Thanks,
jay
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
was wondering if there is any way that the synopsis which gets
produced for the RSS feed could be expanded? For commit messages, it'd
be nice to see some (all?) of the diff. For code reviews, it'd be nice
to just have the complete text.
thanks,
jay
the kind of
application I'm working on in pure JavaScript. That'd suck!)
jay
This comment really isn't a big deal. It would just suck (in my
opinion) to have a whole bunch of people writing the same little
classes all the time...
On Sep 22, 1:02 pm, Emily Crutcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A more
40 matches
Mail list logo
