Comment by alexpor...@gmail.com:
Regarding Categories:
This is probably loosely implied by the definition of simple autobean
interfaces, but it may be worth noting that category methods do not seem to
work if they begin with the phrase get, as it seems like it causes the
decoder to try
Comment by alexpor...@gmail.com:
Regarding Categories:
This is probably loosely implied by the definition of simple autobean
interfaces, but it may be worth noting that category methods do not seem to
work if they begin with the phrase get, as it seems like it causes the
decoder to try
Comment by pclog...@gmail.com:
The best poker blog http://poker-blogs-see.blogspot.com
Best PokerStars blog http://pokerstars-blogs.blogspot.com
Sexy, hot girls imagehttp://china-sexy-girl-images.blogspot.com/
For more information:
Comment by gabriel@gmail.com:
I have another problem and I hope you guys could help me out.
I have an interface named BaseValue
void setValue(String value);
void setValues(ListBaseValue value);
String getValue();
ListBaseValue getValues();
and utils methods such as
int getValueAsInt();
Comment by asolov...@gmail.com:
'Object' type can't be (de)encoded via AutoBean framework. You should read
this section again
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean#Property_types
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean
--
Comment by welt.mic...@googlemail.com:
In your project.gwt.xml :
inherits name=com.google.web.bindery.autobean.AutoBean/
should fix the issue
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Comment by kandula@gmail.com:
Is there a build configuration change I have to do for using AutoBean API?
I'm using gwt-maven-plugin and I see this error when I try to compile my
GWT module
[ERROR] Errors
in
Comment by asolov...@gmail.com:
AutoBean is likely to be good work out for easy (de)serialization. But why
can't it support non-object types? E.g. ListInteger, ListString, String
which could be serialized as [1,2,3], [one,two,three] and simple text
correspondingly. Is it planned in
Comment by ali.sak...@gmail.com:
_Boilerplate, yes boilerplate_
What are those interfaces, factories and categories if not boilerplate?!
Have ever looked at Gson?!
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean
--
Comment by ali.sak...@gmail.com:
_Boilerplate, yes boilerplate_
What are those interfaces, factories and categories if not boilerplate?!
Have you ever looked at Gson?!
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean
--
Comment by david.nouls:
I have the same question as mr autobeanvonautobahn. The current GWT RPC
mechanism is a nightmare for interoperability and also difficult to stress
test with tools like JMeter. We want the ability to reuse the RPC calls
through a JSON API, with not too much
Comment by t.broyer:
RequestFactory is not designed for an RPC style use, but using only
ValueProxy I believe you could do it anyway (it could also be a first step
in migrating from GWT-RPC to RF for CRUD oriented apps)
For more information:
Comment by marius.a...@gmail.com:
Rather than manually declaring interfaces, why not do just
class Person {
String name;
Address address;
}
and then have some internal code generators for required AutoBean
structures?
See also http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/ which is very easy to
Comment by marius.a...@gmail.com:
There are some mistakes in the sample code:
void setName(String name):
should be
void setName(String name);
AutoBeanPerson bean = AutoBeanCodex.decode(myFactory, Person.class,
json);
should be
AutoBeanPerson bean = AutoBeanCodex.decode(factory,
Comment by marius.a...@gmail.com:
There are some mistakes in the sample code:
{{{
void setName(String name):
//should be
void setName(String name);
AutoBeanPerson bean = AutoBeanCodex.decode(myFactory, Person.class,
json);
//should be
AutoBeanPerson bean = AutoBeanCodex.decode(factory,
Comment by hajdin.m:
ja
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Comment by autobeanvonautobahn:
is it possible to use 2.1.1 RequestFactory/AutoBean to convert POJO to
JSON and viceversa
when interacting with a RESTful Web Service ?
the common practice with GWT client-server communication is
to have packages:
client, shared, server, configuring web.xml
Comment by autobeanvonautobahn:
could you please provide a very basic HelloAutoBean sample in the trunk ?
I have been struggling putting code fragments in this wiki together, but
still couldn't get a basic sample to work.
For more information:
Comment by autobeanvonautobahn:
from the server side of things,
how does AutoBean relate to Jackson JSON processor ?
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AutoBean
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
19 matches
Mail list logo
