Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

Seems like we need a bot to publish Waves as Google Code wikis :) -- Arthur Kalmenson On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ray Ryan wrote: > Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish > static views of waves. But without that… > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ray

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Paul Robinson wrote: > [...] I, and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave. > We can probably do something about that. I'll start another thread where people who don't have Wave access yet can indicate interest in signing up. -- http://groups.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish static views of waves. But without that… On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ray Ryan wrote: > That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who > wants to participate, but there's nothing we could do ye

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who wants to participate, but there's nothing we could do yet to make such waves visible to non-members, and that would be really bad. On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Paul Robinson wrote: > I'd hate to see even more discussions

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

I'd hate to see even more discussions moving away from here (because I, and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave). Paul Ray Ryan wrote: > > We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses. > Inconvenient, but it's not that big a deal. > >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses. Inconvenient, but it's not that big a deal. On Feb 2, 2010 7:18 AM, "John Tamplin" wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > I don't understand how... One advantage is that "super" is illegal in any Java package

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > I don't understand how user/src/com/google/gwt/regexp/super is any > different from user/super/com/google/gwt/regexp/translatable, it's > just a matter of including user/super in the classpath (which it > already is). One advantage is that

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

We are in the process of smoke testing 2.0.1. We expect for it to be released in the next day or so. On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:18 AM, David wrote: > Hi, > > The subject of roadmap ... when will we see a 2.0.1 ? We currently > need to run with a patch gwt-servlet) due to a classloading issue > wh

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

Hi, The subject of roadmap ... when will we see a 2.0.1 ? We currently need to run with a patch gwt-servlet) due to a classloading issue which is now in fixed state in the issue database. Moving to a Wave would be great! I'm always waving alone :-S... maybe I can then finally grasp why it is supp

[gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

On Feb 1, 9:33 pm, John Tamplin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > Isn't translatable code generally going into /trunk/user/super, and > > the subpackage being called "translatable" rather than "super"? > > Those are JRE and infrastructure super-source -- this is m

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Sami Jaber wrote: > I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the > list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere for us... > I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that we were switching to a different version control system -- and this

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

John, I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere for us... Since the 2.0 release, I feel that there is less interaction with the contrib list (btw what have been decided for the roadmap ?) and what we are supposed to

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > Isn't translatable code generally going into /trunk/user/super, and > the subpackage being called "translatable" rather than "super"? > Those are JRE and infrastructure super-source -- this is more user-level code. Also, if you put them und

[gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

On 1 fév, 20:26, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote: > Revision: 7517 > Author: tomer...@google.com > Date: Mon Feb  1 08:08:26 2010 > Log: Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests) > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7517 > > Added: >   /tr