Hi all!
I used to use GWT 1.5 for my applications and now I'm migrating to 1.6
M2 for a new project.
Well, in 1.5 I used to use the projectCreator to create the Eclipse
project and then used the applicationCreator to create my application,
but what happens is that my project has 3 parts, a
Hi!
In my module I need to call a RPC service and this service need to
return an array of values with various types.
I tried to use ListObject and fill with Integer, Boolean, String and
so on, but Object is not serializable.
How to accomplish that?
Regards.,
Tercio
Hi All!
I'd like to add some kind of Keyboard Shortcut in my application.
Is that possible to create a global shortcut? Something like CTRL+S
and so on.
I'm using GWT 1.6.4.
I read something about Event.addNativePreviewHandler but I had no
success.
Thanks in advance.
Tercio
Hi!
The problem is that in your function public void showUsers() { you
create a entry into FlexTable for each user, including the non-visible
ones.
Some browsers have problems displaying a huge data.
To solve this you have 2 options:
Create some kind of pagination into your flextable,
Hi!
I have this function:
public ListMapString, Object function1();
I need to serialize a Map with it's value as an Object.
Is that possible to do that specifing which values it will have?
For example, the Object will receive, Integer, Double, String and Date
only.
How to do that?
If I use
Hi!
I know that this isn't the correct forum for my question, as my
problem is related to Google-Gin, but it may be generic for sharing
instances problem.
I'm using Gin for dependent injection in my application, everything
works great, but I'm not able to inject the Injector instance into my
add -bindAddress YOUR_IP to the application arguments when running it
from eclipse.
More info: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4322
Regards,
Tercio
On Apr 21, 9:55 am, Viliam Durina viliam.dur...@gmail.com wrote:
If I run my application in the embedded Jetty
Well, I don't have an answer for your question, but why don't you use
SSL?
I can't trust my data going and coming without been encrypted.
This way you don't need to worry about obfuscation.
Hope can help.
Regards.
Tercio
On Apr 22, 10:47 am, mmoossen mmoos...@gmail.com wrote:
dear all!
i
As long as I know, it isn't possible to build the modules separately.
Regards,
On Sep 13, 6:39 am, KaiWeing kaiwe...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello,
we are currently evaluating GWT as a replacement view layer for a
large product.
This product (now Swing) consist of independend contributions which
You can't.
What you can is handle history changes, that occurs when user push
back and forward in the browser, but only works for links in the same
page(#anchor).
public class Dummy implements ValueChangeHandlerString
{
public Dummy()
{
// Register ourselves with
Hi!
I'm on a Mac 10.6.2 an I have the same issue here. My test as on
WebKit Version 4.0.4 (6531.21.10, r52686).
Using GWT 2.0 and GXT 2.1.0.
I think that the problem is the combination of GXT and GWT. I tested
my application without Hibernate and it is a little faster, but still
very slow.
As GWT-EXT is not more maintained by it's team, I think that would not
be a good idea use it with GWT 2.0. I don't know if it has some issue.
Why don't you use SmartGWT or GXT?
Regards.
On Jan 29, 11:09 am, Roger Studner rstud...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have experience with mixing these two
- Both GXT and Smart GWT are pure gwt (no underlying native JS library,
so expect equivalent speed/performance from the GWT compiler).
Nope, SmartGWT is a wrapper to SmartClient JS Library.
ckendrick and I have different understandings about override ... :-P
We already discussed this
You know guys, this is a tough decision. We all differ in experience
and knowledge.
I think that this criticism is good for every one.
SmartGWT is very good in Server-side integration, with a lot UI
widgets, but it's a wrapper to JS and you can't override the way it
work internally(Yes, some
@mariyan nenchev, my bad, I forgot to mention that it's a EE feature.
But the UI is available in the free version.
GXT API is much like the AWT API.
On Feb 3, 2:21 pm, Jonathan jona...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also using GXT on a very, very large project. My experience has
been pretty positive.
@mariyan nenchev, I used SmartGWT free version for some time and it
was a pain to integrate with EJB(To be honest I gave up). I considered
the paid version, but it's too expensive. You receive a lot of
useless features. You can't choose the ones you need, you must buy
the whole package.
On Feb 3,
Hi!
I have a NumberFormat with 8 decimal places, that the code:
NumberFormat format = NumberFormat.getFormat(#,##0.);
System.out.println(format.format(1234.5678d));
When I run, it prints: 1,234.7852517
But should print: 1,234.5678
If I reduce the
Same issue here
com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException:
com.test.action.BatchAction
at
com.test.action.ActionService_TypeSerializer.raiseSerializationException
(transient source for com.test.action.ActionService_TypeSerializer:
1017)
at
of view.
Both are fine, just look for these points that are more important to
you.
Regards,
Tercio
On Aug 15, 5:22 am, Aladdin alaamu...@gmail.com wrote:
The only difference that the GWT compiler will not include the JS in
the downloadable files. So the optimization is not only for the speed
classes, concepts. Will not have problems to
grow.
Regards,
Tercio
On Aug 15, 1:57 pm, Tercio Filho terciofi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
I used SmartGWT since 1.0.
It has a great Widget library and a great integration with data
providers(Database, XML, JSON, and so on).
People in forum
extend a class or something and change it's functionality.
I think that Chris has a lot of opinions about both systems, and will
be happy with either.
Regards.,
Tercio
On Aug 15, 6:36 pm, ckendrick charles.kendr...@gmail.com wrote:
@Tercio On GXT Store vs SmartGWT DataSource, the SmartGWT
On Aug 16, 7:39 pm, ckendrick charles.kendr...@gmail.com wrote:
@tercio You're still missing the key point. Let's try again:
It is absolutely 100% required in an enterprise application that
different components have different caches, potentially partially
overlapping, on the same dataset
is inside JS code.
I'm not saying that a widget cannot have a cache, I'm saying it just
can't manage it, well, it can, but shouldn't...
Regards,
Tercio.
On Aug 17, 1:56 pm, ckendrick charles.kendr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Tercio, I can't spend more time helping you understand the
architecture
with those scenarios.
Well let's give it a try...
Thank you very much.
Regards.,
Tercio
On Mar 15, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Davsket wrote:
Hello Tercio,
The problem with webAppCreator is that it replaces the project
configuration and mix both previous application creators from 1.5
24 matches
Mail list logo
