I would like to discuss on our Dev call. I spent time as we approached this
CDM refresh cycle to get a final answer for the documentation in Duke Redcap.
Was our lapse (~78% complete on normal ranges) something we could remediate?
We had a unique problem: our central lab lost a section of
Just to share with the GPC-dev group notes from the PCORnet Data WG meeting on
July 17.
Discussion on data quality checks on labs
* Problem: lab completeness check requires >80% of labs reported with
normal ranges, which many sites feel uncomfortable in assigning one if it does
not come
What else for tomorrow?
UTHSCSA is scheduled to scribe
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18NSOQU1dKCc6Hzv_-TpJQnNQ_TBo-zs5Af1AfXH051Y/edit
1. Convene, take roll, review records and plan the next meeting(s).
* 11:00 a.m. Central Time.
​Meeting ID and access code:
