Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Max number of vdisks in a recovery group - is it 64?

Hello Heiner, the 64 vdisk limit per RG is still present in the latest ESS docs: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSYSP8_5.3.5/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.raid.v5r04.adm.doc/bl1adv_vdisks.htm For the other questions, no idea. Regards, Stefan - Original Message - > From: "Billich

[gpfsug-discuss] CES Ganesha netgroup caching?

Hi, I am currently playing around with LDAP netgroups for NFS exports via CES. However, I could not figure out how long Ganesha is caching the netgroup entries? There is definitely some caching, as adding a host to the netgroup does not immediately grant access to the share. A "getent netgroup

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Nested NFSv4 Exports

mnfs export add" usage would show if it supports Pseudo option). Of course, > you can manually do it (using CCR) as Ganesha itself allows it. > Yes, NFSv3 has no pseudo traversal, it should work. > Regards, Malahal. > > > - Original message - > From: "Dietric

[gpfsug-discuss] Nested NFSv4 Exports

Hi, I am currently fiddling around with some nested NFSv4 exports and the differing behaviour to NFSv3. The environment is a GPFS 5.0.1 with enabled CES, so Ganesha is used as the NFS server. Given the following (pseudo) directory structure: /gpfs/filesystem1/directory1

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Experience with CES NFS export management

Hello Bryan, at least changing multiple entries at once is possible. You can copy /var/mmfs/ces/nfs-config/gpfs.ganesha.exports.conf to e.g. /tmp, modify the export (remove/add nodes or options) and load the changed config via "mmnfs export load " That way, only a single restart is issued for

[gpfsug-discuss] Switch from IPoIB connected mode to datagram with ESS 5.2.0?

Hello, during reading the upgrade docs for ESS 5.2.0, I noticed a change in the IPoIB mode. Now it specifies, that datagram (CONNECTED_MODE=no) instead of connected mode should be used. All earlier versions used connected mode. I am wondering about the reason for this change? Or is this only

[gpfsug-discuss] NFS4 ACLs and umask on GPFS

Hello, I am currently trying to understand an issue with ACLs and how GPFS handles the umask. The filesystem is configured for NFS4 ACLs only (-k nfs4), filesets have been configured for chmodAndUpdateACL and the access is through a native GPFS client (v4.2.3). If I create a new file in a

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Scale / Perfmon / Grafana - services running but no data

Yep, have look at this Gist [1] The unit files assumes some paths and users, which are created during the installation of my RPM. [1] https://gist.github.com/stdietrich/b3b985f872ea648d6c03bb6249c44e72 Regards, Stefan - Original Message - > From: "Greg Lehmann"