/2016 06:37 PM
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS API O_NOFOLLOW support
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Thanks Yuri! I do wonder what security implications this might have for
the policy engine
m: Aaron Knister <aaron.s.knis...@nasa.gov>
To: <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Date: 07/22/2016 06:37 PM
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS API O_NOFOLLOW support
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Thanks Yuri! I do wonder what security implic
Hi Everyone,
I've noticed that many GPFS commands (mm*acl,mm*attr) and API calls (in
particular the putacl and getacl functions) have no support for not following
symlinks. Is there some hidden support for gpfs_putacl that will cause it to
not deteference symbolic links? Something like the
