Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-22 Thread Laurence Horrocks-Barlow
s-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Simon >Thompson >> (IT Research Support) Sent: 13 June 2017 09:28 To: gpfsug main >discussion >> list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] >'mmces >> address move' weirdness? >> >>

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-22 Thread Edward Wahl
xt. > > From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org > [mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Simon Thompson > (IT Research Support) Sent: 13 June 2017 09:28 To: gpfsug main discussion > list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Subject: Re:

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-13 Thread Sobey, Richard A
org> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness? Suspending the node doesn't stop the services though, we've done a bunch of testing by connecting to the "real" IP on the box we wanted to test and that works fine. OK, so you end up connecting to shares like \\192.16

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-13 Thread Simon Thompson (IT Research Support)
13 June 2017 at 09:08 To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness? Yes, suspending the node would do it

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-13 Thread Sobey, Richard A
Or this ☺ From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org [mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Frode Myklebust Sent: 13 June 2017 05:42 To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' wei

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-13 Thread Sobey, Richard A
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Simon Thompson (IT Research Support) Sent: 12 June 2017 21:06 To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness? mmces node suspend -N Is what you want. This wil

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-12 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
Switch to node affinity policy, and it will stick to where you move it. "mmces address policy node-affinity". -jf tir. 13. jun. 2017 kl. 06.21 skrev : > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 20:06:09 -, "Simon Thompson (IT Research Support)" > said: > > > mmces node suspend -N > > >

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-12 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 20:06:09 -, "Simon Thompson (IT Research Support)" said: > mmces node suspend -N > > Is what you want. This will move the address and stop it being assigned one, > otherwise the rebalance will occur. Yeah, I figured that part out. What I couldn't wrap my brain around was

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-12 Thread Simon Thompson (IT Research Support)
gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> Date: Monday, 12 June 2017 at 21:01 To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmc

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces address move' weirdness?

2017-06-12 Thread Sobey, Richard A
not alone! From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org> on behalf of valdis.kletni...@vt.edu <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> Sent: 12 June 2017 20:41 To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] 'mmces