On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:08:19 +, "Simon Thompson (IT Research Support)" said:
> Have you looked at using filesets instead an using fileset quotas to achieve
> this?
Note that fileset quotas aren't able to represent "No Storage Allowed"
either
pgpPB2hSjqxVS.pgp
Description: PGP
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 at 12:08 -, Simon Thompson (IT Research Support) wrote:
> Have you looked at using filesets instead an using fileset quotas to
> achieve this?
>
> This is what we do and the max number of filesets (currently) isn't
> an issue for us.
This is a possibility. We will be
...@spectrumscale.org] on behalf of stua...@4gh.net
[stua...@4gh.net]
Sent: 04 December 2017 16:33
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Cc: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Smallest block quota/limit and file quota/limit
possible to set?
We have a /projects
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 08:46:31 -0500, Stephen Ulmer said:
> As described, your case is about not wanting userA to be able to write to a
> fileset if userA isnât in some groups. Donât put them in those groups.
> Thatâs
> not even Spectrum Scale specific, itâs about generic *nix permissions.
other
> countries.
>
> The forum is informally monitored as time permits and should not be used for
> priority messages to the Spectrum Scale (GPFS) team.
>
>
>
> From:Keith Ball <bipc...@gmail.com>
> To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
>
Ball <bipc...@gmail.com>
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Date: 12/04/2017 08:19 AM
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Smallest block quota/limit and file
quota/limit possible to set?
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
From: Keith Ball <kb...@redlin
From: Keith Ball
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 16:13:13 -0500
Subject: Smallest block quota/limit and file quota/limit possible to set?
HI All,
We have a system where all users have their own private group as well.
However, for a given