Hi all,
On the User meeting in London a month ago, they announced that SS 4.2.1
would be released somewhere in June. Since I did not found any release
notes or packages at the passport advantage portal, I guess it it is not
yet released? Does someone knows what would be the timing for this?
___
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
[gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] on behalf of Kenneth
Waegeman [kenneth.waege...@ugent.be]
Sent: 29 June 2016 16:38
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Spectrum Scale 4.2.1
Hi all,
On the User meeting in London a mont
Hi,
In the upgrade procedure (prerequisites) of 4.2.1, I read:
"If you are coming from 4.1.1-X, you must first upgrade to 4.2.0-0. You
may use this 4.2.1-0 package to perform a First Time Install or to
upgrade from an existing 4.2.0-X level."
What does this mean exactly. Should we just instal
This is new, it is explained how they are merged at
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/STXKQY_4.2.1/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v4r21.doc/bl1xx_soc.htm
Cheers!
K
On 04/08/16 04:41, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
I see only 4 pdfs now with slightly different titles to the previous 5
pdfs av
Hi,
Currently our file system is down due to down/unrecovered disks. We try
to start the disks again with mmchdisk, but when we do this, we see this
error in our mmfs.log:
Mon Oct 17 15:28:18.122 2016: [E] smallRead VIO failed due to
uncorrectable read error in vdisk nsd11_MetaData_8M_3p_2 v
Hi,
Having an issue that looks the same as this one:
We can do sequential writes to the filesystem at 7,8 GB/s total , which
is the expected speed for our current storage
backend. While we have even better performance with sequential reads on
raw storage LUNS, using GPFS we can only reach 1G
tem+(GPFS)/page/Testing+network+performance+with+nsdperf
-Aaron
On April 20, 2017 at 10:53:47 EDT, Kenneth Waegeman
wrote:
Hi,
Having an issue that looks the same as this one:
We can do sequential writes to the filesystem at 7,8 GB/s total ,
which is the expected speed for our current
From: Kenneth Waegeman
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Date: 04/20/2017 04:53 PM
Subject:Re: [gpfsug-discuss] bizarre performance behavior
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
Hi,
Having an issue that looks the same as this one:
We can do sequential writes to
: +49 371 6978 2165
Mobile: +49 175 575 2877
E-Mail: uwefa...@de.ibm.com
---
IBM Deutschland Business & Technology Services GmbH / Geschäftsführung:
Andreas Hasse, Thorsten Moehring
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Ehningen / Registergericht: Amtsge
crew
governor to up the frequency (which can affect throughout). If your
frequency scaling governor isn't kicking up the frequency of your CPUs
I've seen that cause this behavior in my testing.
-Aaron
On April 21, 2017 at 05:43:40 EDT, Kenneth Waegeman
wrote:
Hi,
We are running a t
Hi,
Is it possible to let users only write data in filesets where some quota
is explicitly set ?
We have independent filesets with quota defined for users that should
have access in a specific fileset. The problem is when users using
another fileset give eg global write access on their directo
Hi Sven,
I see two parameters that we have set to non-default values that are not
in your list of options still to configure.
verbsRdmasPerConnection (256) and
socketMaxListenConnections (1024)
I remember we had to set socketMaxListenConnections because our cluster
consist of +550 nodes.
A
Hi,
Is there already some information available of gpfs (and protocols) on
el7.4 ?
Thanks!
Kenneth
___
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
s I may as well ask about SLES 12 SP3 as well! TIA.
-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth
Waegeman
Sent: Wednesday, 27 September 2017 6:17 PM
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Subject: [
Hi all,
I was looking into HAWC , using the 'distributed fast storage in client
nodes' method (
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_5.0.0/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v5r00.doc/bl1adv_hawc_using.htm
)
This is achieved by putting a local device on the clients in the
system.log p
essential.
HTH,
--
Vasily Tarasov,
Research Staff Member,
Storage Systems Research,
IBM Research - Almaden
- Original message -
From: Kenneth Waegeman
Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Cc:
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss
Hi all,
We had some leftover files with IO errors on a GPFS FS, so we ran a mmfsck.
Does someone know what these mmfsck errors mean:
Error in inode 38422 snap 0: has nlink field as 1
Error in inode 281057 snap 0: is unreferenced
Attach inode to lost+found of fileset root filesetId 0? no
Th
Hi all,
I didn't see any updates in the faq yet about the new 5.0.4.4 release.
Does this release support rhel 7.8 ?
Thank you!
Kenneth
___
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-disc
On 04/05/2020 12:13, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
On 04/05/2020 10:11, Kenneth Waegeman wrote:
Hi all,
I didn't see any updates in the faq yet about the new 5.0.4.4 release.
Does this release support rhel 7.8 ?
Has the fix for 7.7 with a kernel >= 3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7 been
released ye
19 matches
Mail list logo
