On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus:
I have sent out a few tons of announcements now :)
WinGRASS download stats will be interesting to watch. (and grass-users ML
traffic)
We have GRASS statistics available up to March here:
Hi,
2008/4/25, Markus Neteler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
We have GRASS statistics available up to March here:
http://www.osgeo.org/awstats/awstats.pl?config=grass
Due to the server migration onto telascience.org infrastructure
I/we/someone has to setup awstats on grass.osgeo.org. Maybe me
Markus:
I have sent out a few tons of announcements now :)
WinGRASS download stats will be interesting to watch. (and grass-users ML
traffic)
the big news is wx MS Windows, so perhaps this one by Martin:
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass-wiki/images/Wxgui-startup-windows.png
or for
Markus Neteler wrote:
Markus Neteler wrote:
Ok. So we don't care about the missing scripts (windows
native only problem) and go ahead?
No, I think that you should back-port the scripts.
Is this sufficient?
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/31071
You should also disable
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Glynn Clements
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Is this sufficient?
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/31071
You should also disable the construction of the symlinks.
This was the change in question:
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/30749
At this point we are ready to release.
I am at the start blocks ;-)
Marco
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] per conto di Markus Neteler
Inviato: mer 23/04/2008 14.06
A: GRASS developers list
Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-dev] 6.3.0 is out! please prepare binaries...
On Wed, Apr
anayone, who could help me with debian patches system?
jachym
What's required? I'm a complete noob when it comes to this, but
I'm running basically bleeding edge everything on grass-6.3.svn,
Ubuntu 7.10 64-bit.
~ Eric.
___
grass-dev mailing list
to keep my promise... ;-)
If not ready with the tarball, can I build using releasebranch_6_3?
Thanks
Marco
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] per conto di Markus Neteler
Inviato: mer 23/04/2008 14.06
A: GRASS developers list
Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-dev] 6.3.0 is out! please prepare
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I'm afraid to make so much *pressure*, but, since the 6.3.0 tarball was
released, I promised qgis guys that I would have delayed the qgis release to
put GRASS-6.3.0 in it... I would like very much to keep my promise... ;-)
Sure...
To avoid a mess, we'll do 6.3.0.1 after
- backport of Makefile fix (done)
- backport of missing scripts as needed for Windows native (todo)
Thanks to Martin for the 6.3.0.1 idea.
Markus
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Markus Neteler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at
Hi,
2008/4/21, Wolf Bergenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
IMHO it should be called 6.3.1 since 6.3.0 was already released.
In SVN tags act exactly as branches, so in principle we could simply
checkout the tag and commit.
since we haven't officially announced release 6.3.0, maybe we can tag
again,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
maybe something to add to the testsuite? time to revive work on that?
Yes. And it should be developed in the Addons-SVN.
oh well, moving on... do we tag a 6.3.1 and note somewhere at the bottom
please let's call it
Markus wrote:
please let's call it 6.3.0.1 - then we can go ahead as before
and omit the .1 in the title of the announcement.
(I wrote about 6.3.1 options before reading about the 6.3.0.1 idea)
ok, that's fine. So we just have to update the date in the announcement
after the tag is created.
Markus Neteler wrote:
To avoid a mess, we'll do 6.3.0.1 after
- backport of Makefile fix (done)
- backport of missing scripts as needed for Windows native (todo)
Thanks to Martin for the 6.3.0.1 idea.
I wouldn't use that numbering publicly, i.e. for anything other than
the tag name. If
Hi,
2008/4/22, Glynn Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Markus Neteler wrote:
To avoid a mess, we'll do 6.3.0.1 after
- backport of Makefile fix (done)
- backport of missing scripts as needed for Windows native (todo)
Thanks to Martin for the 6.3.0.1 idea.
I wouldn't use that
Hamish wrote:
- backport of missing scripts as needed for Windows native (todo)
that means that help page index building script needs to be edited to
ignore p.* and the other modules. Otherwise you get an unwanted Paint
Modules section in the module section list, and duplicates in the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Glynn Clements
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Neteler wrote:
Ok. So we don't care about the missing scripts (windows
native only problem) and go ahead?
No, I think that you should back-port the scripts.
Is this sufficient?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Markus Neteler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Glynn Clements
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Neteler wrote:
Ok. So we don't care about the missing scripts (windows
native only problem) and go ahead?
No, I think
- backport of missing scripts as needed for Windows native (todo)
Hamish:
that means that help page index building script needs to be edited to
ignore p.* and the other modules. Otherwise you get an unwanted
Paint Modules section in the module section list, and duplicates
in the other
delay my binary
release.
Marco
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] per conto di Glynn Clements
Inviato: lun 21/04/2008 16.16
A: Markus Neteler
Cc: GRASS developers list
Oggetto: Re: [GRASS-dev] 6.3.0 is out! please prepare binaries...
Markus Neteler wrote:
Before making
I thought the binary package size looked a bit small, and did notice
that some i modules were missing, but figured there was a good reason.
I reverted my download page to the RC6 download, awaiting a new 6.3.0
source tarball.
On Apr 21, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Glynn Clements wrote:
Markus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that means that I should wait for an updated release tarball and
rebuild?
shall I build from SVN trunk to check out that all is working correctly
on Win?
that will take approx 3 hours, so, if I need to re-build from an
unpadated tarball later, consider that the
hi,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Martin Landa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/4/21, Glynn Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note: most of the imagery modules are missing in 6.3.0.
The reason is that changes to the way that SUBDIRS was handled in
imagery/Makefile resulted in most of the
IMHO it should be called 6.3.1 since 6.3.0 was already released.
In SVN tags act exactly as branches, so in principle we could simply
checkout the tag and commit.
--Wolf
On 21.04.2008 19:29, Markus Neteler wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Martin Landa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glynn Clements wrote:
Note: most of the imagery modules are missing in 6.3.0.
yikes. thank you for spotting this before the official announcement
Glynn, really.
lesson 1: Hamish needs to test his Makefile changes with a full clean
lesson 2: Last minute backports are dangerous, even when they
Hamish wrote:
Note: most of the imagery modules are missing in 6.3.0.
yikes. thank you for spotting this before the official announcement
Glynn, really.
lesson 1: Hamish needs to test his Makefile changes with a full clean
That only helps if you actually check that everything which
We should also identify a screenshot to illustrate as for some press
release submissions it can be added. Candidates from the screenshots
section?
the big news is wx MS Windows, so perhaps this one by Martin:
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass-wiki/images/Wxgui-startup-windows.png
or for less
Before making the big announcement, let's prepare
binaries and the final release announcement.
Tarball here:
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass63/source/grass-6.3.0.md5sum
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass63/source/grass-6.3.0.tar.gz
Release announcement under preparation in
Nice one Markus,
Release announcement under preparation in
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-web/trunk/announces/announce_grass630.html
(to be moved to tac Wiki afterwards!)
it'll be there soon.
Hamish
Hi,
I have put a Spanish translation of the announcement in here
http://grass-dev.osgeo.net/node/8
I didn't know how to put it somewhere else. Feel free to convert it in a
non-existent
a href=resumen_grass630.txtShort version (SP: Resument)/a
Hi,
2008/4/19, Otto Dassau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Agustin Diez Castillo wrote:
I have put a Spanish translation of the announcement
Hi Agustin,
hang on, I haven't finished writing the English version yet! The top
section will only change slightly to mention backwards compatibility with
GRASS 6.0 and 6.2. The abstract blurb will be a less wordy
31 matches
Mail list logo
