On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:26 PM, GRASS GIS t...@osgeo.org wrote:
#2032: r.mapcalc does not always respect MASK
-+--
Reporter: pvanbosgeo | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Hamish hamis...@yahoo.com wrote:
Markus Metz wrote:
In this case, would it be ok to enforce umask to 0022 in the start up
script?
two rules to thumb:
we shouldn't restrict others to the limits of our own imagination.
(if someone wants to set their umask
#2033: Moving g.pnmcomp to lib/display to improve render performance of wxGUI
--+-
Reporter: huhabla | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement |
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Glynn Clements
gl...@gclements.plus.com wrote:
Markus Metz wrote:
...
With grass data on a network drive with multi-user access, I would
regard e.g. the contents of the PERMANENT mapset as
particularly-sensitive information.
Plenty of sites will treat
Hi Jan,
very interesting!
as Helmut suggests, it would be best to upload the *diff* to trac at
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/
Please make it a diff against
http://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_4/
so that only the differences are stored.
thanks
Markus
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at
Below kept only timings and number of created segments (from previously posted
tests as well as a few new ones), just as a reference.
All tests above threshold=0.95 fail to deliver. The extreme instruction
threshold=0.95 derives 70 segments. Above this, I think that everything would
be merged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Just seen the very nice i.latlong (BTW: why not r.latlong?): any hope
of having it backported to grass6?
Thanks a lot.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS:
Dear Anna,
would a tri-view Map Swipe be feasible? Thinking of comparing pre-, post- and
changes maps for example.
Best, Nikos
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Nikos Alexandris
n...@nikosalexandris.netwrote:
Dear Anna,
would a tri-view Map Swipe be feasible? Thinking of comparing pre-, post-
and
changes maps for example.
Sorry, not so feasible. I was also thinking about this but it is not much
supported by
Nikos A:
would a tri-view Map Swipe be feasible? Thinking of comparing pre-, post-
and changes maps for example.
Anna K:
Sorry, not so feasible. I was also thinking about this but it is not much
supported by wxPython. It is not impossible but it would be needed to
completely rewrite it
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Just seen the very nice i.latlong (BTW: why not r.latlong?): any hope
of having it backported to grass6?
Done in r57191.
You can test it with:
g.extension
30 YEARS OF GRASS GIS!!!
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/892738_10201550826760526_2040218298_o.jpg
cheers!
madi
--
Best regards,
Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer
European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
#1739: Language switch on wxGUI doesn't affect all strings
-+--
Reporter: MilenaN | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
#2034: GUI crashes on launch for newly compiled binary for Mac OS X
---+
Reporter: cmbarton | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical
I just created a ticket for this: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2034
Michael
__
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution Social Change
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
Paulo van Breugel wrote:
The reason I think such a reminder might be helpful is that modules like
r.neighbors always require an existing map as input and therefore the MASK
will normally be respected.
Respected in the sense that the input will be masked. But
r.neighbors computes the
#2033: Moving g.pnmcomp to lib/display to improve render performance of wxGUI
--+-
Reporter: huhabla | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement |
Markus Neteler wrote:
The point here is (as experienced on our local shared network
grassdata/ recently):
- GRASS allows users to enter their own mapset(s)
- GRASS allows users to read all mapsets and write into the current (own) one
- GRASS does not allow to modify the mapset of a
18 matches
Mail list logo