#1628: segfault in r.walk
---+-
Reporter: pertusus | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.4.6
Component: Raster|Version: svn-releasebranch64
Resolution:
Sorry for not responding earlier, I missed somehow this mail.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Glynn Clements
gl...@gclements.plus.com wrote:
Is there any reason to retain lib/sites as a separate library, rather
than simply merging it into v.in.sites? There isn't a ctypes wrapper
for it, so
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
GRASS GIS wrote:
I have removed the lib/sites dependency of v.vol.rst in 7.x in r60272
(trunk) and r60273 (relbr7).
That appears to leave v.in.sites as the only client of lib/sites. And
it only uses the oldsite functionality (i.e. reading GRASS 5.x
sites maps), as opposed to using the
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
#1628: segfault in r.walk
+---
Reporter: pertusus| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.4.4
#1628: segfault in r.walk
--+-
Reporter: pertusus | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone: 6.4.3
12 matches
Mail list logo
