Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-29 Thread Markus Neteler
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Pietro wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Vaclav Petras wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Pietro wrote: >>> >>> I have fixed these errors, but since these changes are not fixing

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-29 Thread Pietro
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Vaclav Petras wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Pietro wrote: >> >> I have fixed these errors, but since these changes are not fixing >> bugs, I've just reverted them. I will commit these change back to >>

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-29 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, 2016-03-29 15:12 GMT+02:00 Vaclav Petras : > I hope this won't become a common practice. I think trunk is where the > development happens. It is not a stable branch regardless of any plans. > Should I also revert all my non-bugfixes from last weeks? If needed, I can >

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-29 Thread Vaclav Petras
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Pietro wrote: > I have fixed these errors, but since these changes are not fixing > bugs, I've just reverted them. I will commit these change back to > trunk as soon as we can start working on grass72. > I hope this won't become a common

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-29 Thread Pietro
Hi Vaclav, On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Vaclav Petras wrote: > Nice! But please, check the tests: > > http://fatra.cnr.ncsu.edu/grassgistests/reports_for_date-2016-03-25-07-00/report_for_nc_basic_spm_grass7_nc/lib/python/gunittest/test_doctests/index.html >

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-25 Thread Vaclav Petras
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Pietro wrote: > > I commit some changes in pygrass (r68138), temporal library (r68139) > and GRASS scripts (r68140) that were on my trunk from a bit... Nice! But please, check the tests:

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-25 Thread Pietro
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Luca Delucchi wrote: > On 13 March 2016 at 10:52, Maris Nartiss wrote: >> I personally would like to see adoption of PEP8 and moving all python >> code to be python3 ready. As old python versions are dying out, there >>

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-23 Thread Luca Delucchi
On 13 March 2016 at 10:52, Maris Nartiss wrote: > I personally would like to see adoption of PEP8 and moving all python > code to be python3 ready. As old python versions are dying out, there > is less and less initiative to not do so. > Also related to >

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-15 Thread Glynn Clements
Maciej Sieczka wrote: > What are the prospects, if any, for GRASS Python code to conform to > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394 ? > > Not a huge issue to me personally. I'm just curious about GRASS team > opinions on this matter. It might be worth considering. At least in the > future,

Re: [GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-13 Thread Maris Nartiss
I personally would like to see adoption of PEP8 and moving all python code to be python3 ready. As old python versions are dying out, there is less and less initiative to not do so. Also related to https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2016-February/078828.html Māris. 2016-03-12 22:56

[GRASS-dev] PEP 394 - The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems

2016-03-12 Thread Maciej Sieczka
Hi, What are the prospects, if any, for GRASS Python code to conform to https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394 ? Not a huge issue to me personally. I'm just curious about GRASS team opinions on this matter. It might be worth considering. At least in the future, when more distros move to