Hi,
2014-11-01 1:07 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
[...]
Future fixes in trunk (i.e. GRASS GIS 7.1.svn) may be backported to
Addons at this point.
we could probably also remove these modules from trunk and maintain
them on one place only (addons for now, can be changed in the
Martin Landa wrote
Hi,
2014-11-01 1:07 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler lt;
neteler@
gt;:
[...]
Future fixes in trunk (i.e. GRASS GIS 7.1.svn) may be backported to
Addons at this point.
we could probably also remove these modules from trunk and maintain
them on one place only (addons
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky hel...@web.de wrote:
Martin Landa wrote
we could probably also remove these modules from trunk and maintain
them on one place only (addons for now, can be changed in the future).
What do you think about that?
yes, good point.
Martin
+1
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky hel...@web.de wrote:
Martin Landa wrote
we could probably also remove these modules from trunk and maintain
them on one place only (addons for now, can be changed in the
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-23 17:23 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
In case of moving them back to Addons, it would be r.stream.* except
for r.stream.extract.
any opinion from MarkusM who disabled r.streams.* modules in
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2014-10-07 17:32 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
[...]
Concerning the release branch of GRASS 7, in r59606 the r.stream.*
modules got disabled.
If they are not yet production ready, should
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Margherita Di Leo direg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-07 17:32 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
[...]
Concerning the release branch of GRASS 7, in r59606 the r.stream.*
Hi,
2014-10-23 17:23 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
Can I urge please to take a decision, either ways.
In case of moving them back to Addons, it would be r.stream.* except
for r.stream.extract.
any opinion from MarkusM who disabled r.streams.* modules in releasebranch_70?
Hi,
back to the r.stream.* tools:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Markus Metz
markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu wrote:
On Jan 19, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
it's not only question of putting it here. The modules
Hi,
2014-10-07 17:32 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
[...]
Concerning the release branch of GRASS 7, in r59606 the r.stream.*
modules got disabled.
If they are not yet production ready, should we move them back to Addons?
MarkusM: Is there any chance to fix them before releasing
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu wrote:
On Jan 19, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2014/1/19 Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu:
Maybe it just waits for somebody to put it there, we would like to see it
in the core as well.
r.stream.extract is
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Margherita Di Leo
dileomargher...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Johannes Radinger
So for the meanwhile I can use the workaround with compiling r.stream.*
directly with the source for G7, however maybe other users in future are
also interested
Maybe it just waits for somebody to put it there, we would like to see it in
the core as well.
Do we need for some kind of procedure to decide (e.g. through PSC action,
verify that it has been thoroughly tested)
and to designate a developer who moves the code from add-ons to the core?
Helena
Hi,
2014/1/19 Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu:
Maybe it just waits for somebody to put it there, we would like to see it in
the core as well.
it's not only question of putting it here. The modules need some
review (code, parameters, manuals). I will be able to help with this
procedure in
On Jan 19, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2014/1/19 Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu:
Maybe it just waits for somebody to put it there, we would like to see it in
the core as well.
it's not only question of putting it here. The modules need some
review (code, parameters,
Hi
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Johannes Radinger
johannesradin...@gmail.com wrote:
So for the meanwhile I can use the workaround with compiling r.stream.*
directly with the source for G7, however maybe other users in future are
also interested in using these add-ons and will face
16 matches
Mail list logo
