Dear all,
From a user-perspective, I would like to say that one of the big plusses of
GRASS is it`s consistency over time (also in the GUI). The transition from
TclTK to WXPython went so smoothly for me, because principles stood the same.
Do not get me wrong, I am not against
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate of the upcoming
GRASS GIS 7.0.0 version.
Between 7.0.0beta4 and the current 7.0.0RC1 about 200 updates have been applied.
MOST IMPORTANT CHANGES in RC1:
* Completion of the major efforts in standardization of parameter and
flag names for a
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, should be fixed in r64210. The Select widget consist of comboctrl and
textctrl and the source of events has apparently changed. I already fixed a
couple of those but I am sure there are still a lot of bugs.
Thank
Hi,
2015-01-16 3:24 GMT+01:00 Anna Petrášová kratocha...@gmail.com:
ok, should be fixed in r64210. The Select widget consist of comboctrl and
textctrl and the source of events has apparently changed. I already fixed a
couple of those but I am sure there are still a lot of bugs.
I have tested
On Fri Jan 16 2015 at 9:04:15 AM Blumentrath, Stefan
stefan.blumentr...@nina.no wrote:
Dear all,
From a user-perspective, I would like to say that one of the big plusses
of GRASS is it`s consistency over time (also in the GUI). The transition
from TclTK to WXPython went so smoothly for me,
Dear all,
On a regularly basis I am asked by colleagues to extract raster based time
series data (with 20k maps) for a (set of) point(s).
After both t.vect.observe.strds, t.sample and t.vect.what.strds seem to have a
different purposes, I do this using a little shell script which mainly uses
That is because I forgot to attach it... ;-)
Here it comes...
-Original Message-
From: Sören Gebbert [mailto:soerengebb...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 16. januar 2015 10:38
To: Blumentrath, Stefan
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] Sampling STRDS at point location(s)
Hi Stefan,
can you please attach
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2015-01-05 15:32 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
...
these errors are related to the recent API changes in GRASS
Hi Markus,
2015-01-16 10:44 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org:
Since it appears to work, can you please backport it to GDAL 1.11?
already done [1].
Martin
[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/28291
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
Dear devs,
In my institute several colleagues use (different types of) temperature logger
in order to collect primary temperature data with more relevance for local
vegetation than the coarse air temperature data we get from our meteorological
institute.
Different types of loggers are used in
Yes I am interested Stefan
On 16 January 2015 at 15:55, Blumentrath, Stefan stefan.blumentr...@nina.no
wrote:
Dear devs,
In my institute several colleagues use (different types of) temperature
logger in order to collect primary temperature data with more relevance for
local vegetation
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
Done!
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.0.0RC1-News
Now time to announce it...
Can we please get RC2 out soon? In the last days I have fixed numerous
bugs in the vector library and changed/restored the basic
Hi,
2015-01-16 12:13 GMT+01:00 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
Can we please get RC2 out soon? In the last days I have fixed numerous
bugs in the vector library and changed/restored the basic vector IO
interface, it is now more similar to G6 and it needed some code clean
up.
I
I have three flags: i, d and c. When I use
#%rules
#%required i,d,c
#%end
and then run the script, I get the message:
Unknown option i in rule
Unknown option d in rule
Unknown option c in rule
ERROR: Internal error: option or flag not found
Any idea what I might be doing wrong? Using the
On 16 January 2015 at 12:15, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi
I agree, but would suggest to wait at least one/two week(s), probably
more bugfixes will be collected.
+1
Martin
--
ciao
Luca
http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
www.lucadelu.org
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Paulo van Breugel
p.vanbreu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have three flags: i, d and c. When I use
#%rules
#%required i,d,c
^^^ -- I think the colon is missing
#%end
and then run the script, I get the message:
Unknown option i in rule
Unknown
#2549: Wrong quartiles in r.hypso.py
--+-
Reporter: AtimGrass| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Paulo van Breugel
p.vanbreu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have three flags: i, d and c. When I use
#%rules
#%required i,d,c
^^^ -- I think the colon is missing
#%end
On 16/01/15 12:15, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2015-01-16 12:13 GMT+01:00 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
Can we please get RC2 out soon? In the last days I have fixed numerous
bugs in the vector library and changed/restored the basic vector IO
interface, it is now more similar to G6
Hi Stefan,
from my understanding of your requirements and the study of your
script i would say, that t.vect.observe.strds should be the right tool
for you.
This module has two inputs. The first input is a vector map layer with
vector points. The second input is one or several space time raster
Hi Sören,
And thanks for clarification.
I thought that t.vect.observe.strds would do what I am up to, but it is rather
time-consuming for 20k maps.
So I thought it`s main purpose must be to generate a new STVDS from an STRDS.
Using r.what is much, much faster (15 min compared to 12h for
Hi Stefan,
the most time consuming part of t.vect.observe.strds is the SQL
database handling in v.what.rast. Indeed, r.what is in this regards
much faster.
You can extent t.vect.observe.strds to use r.what instead of
v.what.rast. In this case, an output file with values is generated
rather than a
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paulo van Breugel
p.vanbreu...@gmail.com wrote:
I see what I missed: the flag needs to be given with a leading -:
#%rules
# %required: -i,-d,-c
#%end
It might be useful to have an example of both rules for options and for
flags (in the example section or
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
On 16/01/15 12:15, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2015-01-16 12:13 GMT+01:00 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
Can we please get RC2 out soon? In the last days I have fixed numerous
bugs in the vector
#2550: Polygons disappear after v.generalize simplification
+---
Reporter: dido| Owner:
grass-dev@…
Type: defect
Hi Sören,
Your idea to include this functionality into t.vect.observe.strds is probably
the most elegant solution, as long as no C-developer prefers to remove the 400
maps limit in r.what...
If the latter is not the case (or if one would run into memory problems when
running r.what with 20k
In view of Markus M explanation, +1 for RC2 today rather than tomorrow.
On 16 January 2015 at 20:31, Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
On 16/01/15 12:15, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
#2551: g.gui.tplot error message
--+-
Reporter: hellik| Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: normal| Milestone: 7.0.0
2015-01-16 16:31 GMT+01:00 Yann Chemin yche...@gmail.com:
In view of Markus M explanation, +1 for RC2 today rather than tomorrow.
I don't see any reason why to hurry so much. Let's wait at least some
days. Martin
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
#2550: Polygons disappear after v.generalize simplification
+---
Reporter: dido| Owner:
grass-dev@…
Type: defect
Hi Martin,
Just tested the procedure and got unmet dependency errors (on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
32bit). First grass70-core and grass70-gui were missing, but when I added them:
sudo apt-get install grass70 grass70-core grass70-gui
I still get unmet dependencies errors, but without information about
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-01-16 16:31 GMT+01:00 Yann Chemin yche...@gmail.com:
In view of Markus M explanation, +1 for RC2 today rather than tomorrow.
I don't see any reason why to hurry so much. Let's wait at least some
days. Martin
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com
wrote:
The fixes are all thoroughly tested (I guess I have never
before tested vector topology so thoroughly...).
Hi Markus,
will you be able to turn your tests into testsuite scripts? It is
additional work but it
#2532: TypeError: environment can only contain string when launching script on
Windows
-+--
Reporter: annakrat | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Anna Petrášová wrote:
If I am not wrong, we are still missing the relations in the modules' xml
representation. So it has to be first added there and then the python class
Task must incorporate it. Then we start working on the GUI.
r64226 adds the rule information to the
Paulo van Breugel wrote:
It might be useful to have an example of both rules for options and for
flags (in the example section or perhaps even in the 'Conditional
parameter' section like below
For scripts, relationships are specified using a rules section, e.g.for
options:
36 matches
Mail list logo
