Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

2015-01-06 Thread Martin Landa
Hi all, 2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org: I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement. I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think?

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

2015-01-06 Thread Moritz Lennert
On 06/01/15 11:25, Martin Landa wrote: Hi all, 2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org: I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement. I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some deadline for discussion and then to

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

2015-01-06 Thread Scott Mitchell
Since I'm in there anyway editing a couple of minor grammatical fixes, I've deleted that sentence based on this latest exchange plus the fact that it makes sense to me. But I'm doing so in the comfort of knowing that my edits can be easily reverted, so don't hesitate if there's reason. On Jan