I second Helena on quorum (min 51%), and also +1 for the 7 days suggestion
of MaDi.
On 7 April 2014 06:19, Helena Mitasova hmit...@ncsu.edu wrote:
I agree with the voting rules with the following changes/comments:
- change 4 business days to seven days to avoid confusion given that
business
I am OK with the former donors page, with a (past years) date of funding
and a thank you note from GRASS.
On 1 April 2014 13:21, Margherita Di Leo direg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
On 01/04/14 09:24, Margherita
It looks like we all want to see version numbers move on a yearly basis
with periods of branching and periods of releasing...
Should we finalize this policy and implement it?
On 31 March 2014 23:54, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
2014-03-31 20:07 GMT+02:00 Luca
In favour of giving the devbranch6 a prune, I cannot remember when I used
grass6-dev last time...
+1 to remove devbranch6 after appropriate transfer of the needed to
releasebranch6.
Do we have a tentative time line to freeze Grass6 release branch (1 year?)
Yann
On 29 March 2014 11:34, Luca
+1
On 30 March 2014 02:47, Helmut Kudrnovsky hel...@web.de wrote:
Dear GRASS GIS PSC,
margherita wrote
Dear Luca,
thank you for raising this issue,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Luca Delucchi lt;
lucadeluge@
gt; wrote:
with the upcoming GRASS 7 release we have to
