It looks like we all want to see version numbers move on a yearly basis
with periods of branching and periods of releasing...
Should we finalize this policy and implement it?






On 31 March 2014 23:54, Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> 2014-03-31 20:07 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi <lucadel...@gmail.com>:
> > On 31 March 2014 17:40, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> First, the lengths of time periods. First question is how often we want
> to
> >> release MAJOR.MINOR version. Once a year looks good for me but I have no
> >> special reasons for this. The length of period between fork and release
> can
> >> be probably anything from 1 month to 6 months. The length of period
> after
> >> release to next release should be the rest so from 6 month to 11.
> >>
> >
> > +1 I think the same.
> > For my point of view the length of period between fork and release
> > could be reasonable between 2 and 4 months and the others 8-6 months
> > after release
>
> I would strongly agree with such release policy. Martin
>
> --
> Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>



-- 
----
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

Reply via email to