On 19/05/14 05:30, GRASS GIS wrote:
And again, even if this were a valid candidate for G6, backporting stuff
directly to 6.4 without going into devbr6 for at least light/any testing
first, especially anything which touches core libgis, especially a time
right before RC release, is
Hi,
2014-05-19 9:50 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be:
[...]
How about my proposal from a few weeks ago: Nobody commits to
grass64release, only to grass6dev, and Hamish is the official maintainer of
grass64release and decides what can be backported ?
This obviously can