Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

Dear all, 2015-10-25 19:37 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler : >> I agree with Martin, I guess it's quite a bit of work involved in it and it >> seems we now started to release more often than in previous years, which is >> a good trend. So I would rather release more often with less

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Anna Petrášová wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Martin Landa ... >> I understand the point, on the other hand it's extra work for release >> manager and packager which would sometimes make sense to avoid

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

On 20/10/15 09:18, Martin Landa wrote: 2015-10-20 9:12 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa : Great, so I'll make a motion on this in the next days unless any objection pops up before. it seems that there are no objections :-) Martin reading it again, I would say that in some

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

Hi Markus, 2015-03-04 20:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler : [...] > Great, so I'll make a motion on this in the next days unless any > objection pops up before. it seems that there are no objections :-) Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Martin Landa wrote: > Hi, > > 2015-10-20 9:36 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert : > > > The idea of the RC2 was to provoke some more last-minute testing as some > > fixes might have been introduced after RC1 and I'm

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

Hi, 2015-10-20 9:36 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert : > The idea of the RC2 was to provoke some more last-minute testing as some > fixes might have been introduced after RC1 and I'm not sure how many people > test the release branch between RC's. This way we make it more

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

On 04/03/15 09:19, Martin Landa wrote: Hi, 2015-03-03 9:31 GMT+01:00 Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be: A final, concerted bug squashing effort by all developers of no more than one week. During that same time the release announcement is drafted. If an important bug is discovered for

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote: On 04/03/15 09:19, Martin Landa wrote: Hi, 2015-03-03 9:31 GMT+01:00 Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be: A final, concerted bug squashing effort by all developers of no more than one week. During

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

On 01/03/15 19:02, Markus Neteler wrote: Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Scott Mitchell smi...@me.com wrote: Agreed, and I like Markus’ idea of testing it on an upcoming release. (just a low priority comment here)

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

I agree. Michael C. Michael Barton Director, Center for Social Dynamics Complexity Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution Social Change Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science Arizona State University voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC),

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

I agree with the suggested modification by Moritz, Helena Helena Mitasova Professor at the Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences and Center for Geospatial Analytics North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-8208 hmit...@ncsu.edu http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/osgeorel/ All

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Scott Mitchell smi...@me.com wrote: Agreed, and I like Markus’ idea of testing it on an upcoming release. (just a low priority comment here) While doing so it turns out that one

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Scott Mitchell smi...@me.com wrote: Agreed, and I like Markus’ idea of testing it on an upcoming release. (just a low priority comment here) While doing so it turns out that one week between RC2 and final is a bit short. And some urgent fixes came in only during

Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC 4: Release procedure

Hi, 2014-06-11 11:30 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert mlenn...@club.worldonline.be: Recent discussion have convinced me that we might need a more clearly defined release procedure for the GRASS project in order to make release more fluid and less conflictual. thanks for your effort. I very rapidly