Re: [GRASS-PSC] How to modify module folder content in SVN

2015-06-23 Thread Eva Stopková
Dear Vašek and Moritz, thank you for suggestions. I didn't get that before, but I agree with Moritz that two versions are not ideal. Is there any reason to keep both? Performance? Different quality algorithms/results? Do you have some tests or benchmarks which would compare them? I have done

Re: [GRASS-PSC] How to modify module folder content in SVN

2015-06-22 Thread Moritz Lennert
On 22/06/15 11:21, Eva Stopková wrote: Hi Vasek, thank you for the advices. Great news! This means that both are now easily usable for all users without any special effort. Would you like to do the announcement on grass-user mailing list? (In case you are not subscribed, I can send

Re: [GRASS-PSC] How to modify module folder content in SVN

2015-06-22 Thread Vaclav Petras
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Eva Stopková eva.stopk...@gmail.com wrote: My first idea was to completely replace PCL version, so I did not modify them. But then I realized it would be better to save both versions, so at first I would like to make them as much identical as possible

[GRASS-PSC] How to modify module folder content in SVN

2015-06-20 Thread Eva Stopková
Dear all, I would like to ask you for advice. I have just commited new versions of modules *v.kriging* and *v.nnstat* (this commit is incomplete because of the issue described below). But now there are pairs of the source codes in C and in C++ in SVN - I replaced *kd-tree* (from PCL library) by

Re: [GRASS-PSC] How to modify module folder content in SVN

2015-06-20 Thread Vaclav Petras
Hi Eva, On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Eva Stopková eva.stopk...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I would like to ask you for advice. I have just commited new versions of modules *v.kriging* and *v.nnstat* (this commit is incomplete because of the issue described below). But now there are