Thank you, I'll try it
VB
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 22:53 +0200, Markus Neteler a écrit :
Unless you don't use GEM then you are fine to remove/rename it.
Markus
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Vincent Bain b...@toraval.fr wrote:
In my case, what if I voluntarily remove gem6 before
Hi,
till recently I used to work on a Hardy-Ubuntu GNU/linux. I was able to
run various grass versions installed on the system. Now on Debian I
cannot install let's say 640_rc2 if 6.5.svn is already installed. The
error returned by the system deals with the replacement of
file
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Vincent Bain b...@toraval.fr wrote:
Hi,
till recently I used to work on a Hardy-Ubuntu GNU/linux. I was able to
run various grass versions installed on the system. Now on Debian I
cannot install let's say 640_rc2 if 6.5.svn is already installed. The
error
Perhaps,
but it could be interesting to check whether the error is reproductible,
or it is due to a configuration mess on my system...
Thank you,
VB
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 22:18 +0200, Markus Neteler a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Vincent Bain b...@toraval.fr wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Vincent Bain b...@toraval.fr wrote:
Perhaps,
but it could be interesting to check whether the error is reproductible,
Yes: because in all GRASS 6 versions it is called gem6 (unfortunately).
So it must conflict...
If the others agree I'll start to add the second
In my case, what if I voluntarily remove gem6 before installing a second
version of Grass ? will the previous grass install be damaged ?
Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 22:28 +0200, Markus Neteler a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Vincent Bain b...@toraval.fr wrote:
Perhaps,
but it
Unless you don't use GEM then you are fine to remove/rename it.
Markus
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Vincent Bain b...@toraval.fr wrote:
In my case, what if I voluntarily remove gem6 before installing a second
version of Grass ? will the previous grass install be damaged ?
Le mercredi
[/usr/bin/gem6]
(does it need to be in the main PATH at all? even if it is
meanto to be
used outside of a grass session)
Markus wrote:
If the others agree I'll start to add the second
version number starting with GRASS 6.5.
sounds good.
Then behaviour doesn't change for 6.4.
