On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Jeff McKenna wrote:
- goto https://epsg.org
Jeff,
Thanks for excellent advice. I decided to be consistent and use the
NAD83(HARN)/meters EPSG for Washington South to be consistent with what I've
used in other projects and other states. That EPSG code is 2856.
Now I'll
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Micha Silver wrote:
IMHO you should *not* do that. Just create a new Location.
Micha,
I thought that would be the answer. Then I need to reproject all data at
least twice, then rename the new location.
Regards,
Rich
___
On 9/23/21 3:38 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
Yet, ... I have a question: is there a way in grass to change the
PROJ_INFO
in the PERMANENT mapset of a location to a new projecion? Or, do I
manually
edit that file?
IMHO you should *not* do that. Just create a new Location.
Thanks in
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Jeff McKenna wrote:
On 2021-09-23 8:55 a.m., Jeff McKenna wrote:
NAD83 / UTM zone 10N + NAVD88
It could also be that no one yet has submitted this to the EPSG geodetic
committee, for inclusion (UTM zone 10N with that vertical datum). *hint*
*maybe you should* (PS I've
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Jeff McKenna wrote:
Taking a look at your output, my brain said "good question", ha.
Jeff,
There are so many value-specific codes I didn't see an overall code.
Usually the key line to look for is the "AUTHORITY:" line, which yours lacks.
Ah-ha. That's good
On 2021-09-23 8:55 a.m., Jeff McKenna wrote:
NAD83 / UTM zone 10N + NAVD88
It could also be that no one yet has submitted this to the EPSG geodetic
committee, for inclusion (UTM zone 10N with that vertical datum). *hint*
*maybe you should* (PS I've submitted several, just use the mindset
Hi Rich,
Taking a look at your output, my brain said "good question", ha.
Usually the key line to look for is the "AUTHORITY:" line, which yours
lacks.
So the usual next step is to start searching on https://epsg.io for the
text "UTM zone 10N".
But more recently the official EPSG homepage
