[gmx-users] Cavity analysis of Protein

2018-03-11 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
Dear People, I want to study and characterize cavity of a protein. I mean i want to characterize opening and closing of protein cavity. Is there any tool of gromacs which will help me do that?. Are there other softwares to do that? Thanks Bhupendra -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please

Re: [gmx-users] Dose gpu support on flatbottom restraint

2018-04-02 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
> > Kevin > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 6:46 AM, Bhupendra Dandekar < > bhupendra.dandekar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Gromacs users > > I wanted to know whether flatbottom restraint does have GPU support or > > not?. > > > > I was trying a

[gmx-users] Dose gpu support on flatbottom restraint

2018-03-31 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
Hi Gromacs users I wanted to know whether flatbottom restraint does have GPU support or not?. I was trying a simulation with gromacs 5.0.6 and gromacs 5.1.4 with gpu in presence of flatbottom restraints. But in presence of gpu mode, these give segmentation fault. But if I run the same program

Re: [gmx-users] acpype

2018-10-24 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
Dear Farial, Use this command to install acpype and antechamber using conda: conda install -c acpype -c openbabel -c ambermd and then you can check and call acpype, antechamber like this from your terminal: acpype -h antechamber -h then you can generate ligand topology using this command:

Re: [gmx-users] acpype

2018-10-24 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
t; > Alan > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 11:20, Bhupendra Dandekar < > bhupendra.dandekar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Farial, > > > > Use this command to install acpype and antechamber using conda: > > > > conda install -c acpype -c openbabel -c ambermd

Re: [gmx-users] acpype

2018-10-24 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
I actually got lot of help from Luciano Kagami about installation and usage of acpype and ligro. Thanks to both of you. Bhupendra On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:38 PM Bhupendra Dandekar < bhupendra.dandekar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks to you also sir. > Your work is really

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 174, Issue 62

2018-10-28 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
ext/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > > We are working on it now. I can't tell you exactly because we need > several > > tests. It's a complete new version re-written from scratch. > > > > I'm really sorry for the inconvenience but we hope to b

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 174, Issue 71

2018-10-29 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
; Today's Topics: > > > >1. Error of CgenFF convert to itp (Mijiddorj B) > >2. acpype and conda (Farial Tavakoli) > >3. Re: acpype and conda (Bhupendra Dandekar) > >4. Place a gap in y-axis (Raag S

Re: [gmx-users] acpype and conda

2018-10-29 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
Hi Farial, Are you online now? Bhupendra On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:10 PM Farial Tavakoli wrote: > Dear Bhupendra > > Thanks for your reply > > I am in /Downloads/acpype-master/acpype/scripts path and type only acpype > -h or acpype.py -h , but face with this error: > acpype: command not

[gmx-users] Linear Interaction Energy Calculation (LIE) using gromacs

2018-11-01 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
Dear all, I want to perform LIE calculations. I want to know what are the steps for LIE calculations. I know that we need to perform two simulations for Protein-Ligand and Ligand separately. Are these two simulations are same as we do in regular MD simulations with EM->NVT->NPT->Prod-RUN steps?

[gmx-users] Linear Interaction Energy Calculation (LIE) using gromacs

2018-11-01 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
Dear all, I want to perform LIE calculations. I want to know what are the steps for LIE calculations. I know that we need to perform two simulations for Protein-Ligand and Ligand separately. Are these two simulations are same as we do in regular MD simulations with EM->NVT->NPT->Prod-RUN steps?

Re: [gmx-users] Calculating C-alpha RMSD for coarse grained simulation

2020-01-16 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
I will look into this and get back to you again. But meanwhile just try using .tpr file instead of.gro file in your pbc correction step. Thanks Bhupendra On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 10:07 PM Rabeta Yeasmin wrote: > Hi Bhupendra, > > Thanks for your reply. The RMSD is actually 3.5nm means 35A, which

Re: [gmx-users] Calculating C-alpha RMSD for coarse grained simulation

2020-01-14 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
Dear Rebeta Did you visualise your trajectory? If not then kindly first do that. If the protein in your CG simulation is fluctuating a lot then the rmsd of 3.5 can make sense. Also, prepare a separate index for protein BB(backbone) bead only and use it in rmsd fitting as well as rmsd

Re: [gmx-users] Calculating C-alpha RMSD for coarse grained simulation

2020-01-16 Thread Bhupendra Dandekar
the RMSD after this, it looks reasonable now. > Thanks for suggesting to check the trajectory. > > Rabeta Yeasmin > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:46 AM Bhupendra Dandekar < > bhupendra.dandekar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I will look into this and get back to you ag