Hi,
I am running some coarse grained simulations of a membrane-protein system using
Martini force field.
If I ran it using GMX5.1 and the mdp file provided by Martini website for GMX5,
the load imbalance will gradually increase to over 80% from 4-10% at the
beginning in a few hours. When I
Dear all,
Can anyone shed some light as ,Is it possible to apply force/time for
pulling in gromacs. Means I want to pull my system in step wise . eg.
0 - t1 force applied f1
t1+dt to t2 force f2
t2+dt to t3 force f3
.
.
.
tn-1 +dt to tn force fn
Is it possible.
Hello, Thank you for your reading.I am trying free energy
calculation about base pair mutation(G * T -> G_enol * T). Actually,
I explicitly mention a both state A and B in topology file(Atom type,
charge, any parameter related). So, I didn't use couple-moltype option
because
Dear all,I need to use make_ndx, but it doesn't work. I mean, I will put my
group numbers, and it finishes successfully, but at the end there is nothing in
the .ndx file. 0 System : 24552 atoms 1 Other :
576 atoms 2 ACC : 504 atoms 3 K+
Linda,
This should indeed normally not happen, but before diving deep into the
issue I'd suggest testing more recent releases of GROMACS, preferably
2018.2 so we know if there is an issue in the currently actively supported
release.
Secondly, load imbalance is not necessarily a bad thing if it
Hi,
This is likely an issue with the combination of gcc and CUDA versions you
are using. What are these versions? Can you install the latest CUDA (or at
least recent) and see if it solves the issue?
Cheers,
--
Szilárd
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:00 PM Lovuit CHEN wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> I
On 8/9/18 6:37 AM, Rakesh Mishra wrote:
Dear all,
Can anyone shed some light as ,Is it possible to apply force/time for
pulling in gromacs. Means I want to pull my system in step wise . eg.
0 - t1 force applied f1
t1+dt to t2 force f2
t2+dt to t3 force f3
.
.
Genevieve,
Create a 3, 4 or 5 mer of the PVT and submit to ATB ( the wonderful topology
makers ) to obtain the itp. ( 4A7 ff ) That wil give you the beginning middle
and end mers for buiding a plymers as Justin has shown for PE.
A second route is to build PVT under 500 atoms and submit
Hi users.
It look so complicated to carry out a protein ligand simulation in Lipid
bilayer system using charmm ff. I have a ligand with 27 atoms ( includes
Hydrogen ). The initial structure (monomer) is simulated in popc
constructed using charmm gui web page. To construct the same for the
UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉE
Hello!
As part of my research, I need the structure of polyvinyltoluene to perform
molecular dynamics simulations.
I searched for it in Crystallography Open Database (COD) and in Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), but found nothing.
I'm wondering if
Hi,
> It look so complicated to carry out a protein ligand simulation in Lipid
> bilayer system using charmm ff. I have a ligand with 27 atoms ( includes
> Hydrogen ). The initial structure (monomer) is simulated in popc
> constructed using charmm gui web page. To construct the same for the
>
Hi.
Thank you.
But the system (protein ligand) is being constructed in charm gui input
generator, where it automatically compare the complex pdb and ligand mol2
file ( which will Ben uploaded ).
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 11:24 PM, Abhishek Acharya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> > It look so complicated to
Dear Gromacs Users,
I want to calculate the center to center distance of two cylindrical
micelles in my simulation. What gmx command should I use to calculate the
distance? Can anyone help me?
Thank you.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
13 matches
Mail list logo