Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2020-02-19 Thread Alessandra Villa
.@maillist.sys.kth.se < > gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se> On Behalf Of > Alessandra Villa > Sent: maandag 17 februari 2020 9:34 > To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials > > Hi, > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 5:17 PM Ali Khodayari < &g

Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2020-02-18 Thread Ali Khodayari
sandra Villa > Sent: donderdag 13 februari 2020 16:28 > To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org; gromacs.org_gmx-users < > gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se> > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials > > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:59 PM Ali Khodayari < > ali.kho

Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2020-02-17 Thread Alessandra Villa
ebruari 2020 16:28 > To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org; gromacs.org_gmx-users < > gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se> > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials > > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:59 PM Ali Khodayari < > ali.khoday...@student.kuleuven.be> w

Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2020-02-14 Thread Ali Khodayari
, Ali -Original Message- From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se On Behalf Of Alessandra Villa Sent: donderdag 13 februari 2020 16:28 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org; gromacs.org_gmx-users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials Hi, On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:59 PM

Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2020-02-13 Thread Alessandra Villa
Hi, On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:59 PM Ali Khodayari < ali.khoday...@student.kuleuven.be> wrote: > Dear Gromacs users, > > I’ve got a question regarding the tabulated potentials for bonded > interactions. > > Gromacs recognises and reads the non-bonded potential tables through the > energy groups s

[gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2020-02-12 Thread Ali Khodayari
Dear Gromacs users, I’ve got a question regarding the tabulated potentials for bonded interactions. Gromacs recognises and reads the non-bonded potential tables through the energy groups specified. But how can I refer each bond type to its table? I have derived coarse-grained potentials for a c

Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2015-05-25 Thread Mark Abraham
Best, > > Zhengcai > > > > Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 11:55:22 + > From: Mark Abraham > To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org, gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-

Re: [gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2015-05-23 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Does your table reproduce the potential and force for two methane atoms at different distances (use mdrun -rerun) Mark On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:21 PM 张正财 wrote: > Dear all, > I want to add the Morse potential ( > U=D*[exp(a*(1-r/r0)-2*exp(a/2*(1-r/r0)] ) for nonbonded interactions

[gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2015-05-23 Thread 张正财
Dear all, I want to add the Morse potential ( U=D*[exp(a*(1-r/r0)-2*exp(a/2*(1-r/r0)] ) for nonbonded interactions between CH4-CH4. So, I made three table files to correspond to the interactions between H-H, C-H, and C-C, and I changed vdwtype=user ,Dispcorr=no , energrps = C H , and en

[gmx-users] Tabulated potentials

2014-11-03 Thread Francesco Mambretti
 Dear GROMACS users and developers, I am using GROMACS 5.0.1. I would like to use tabulated potentials (Aziz ones for argon and krypton in particular); as a starting test, I began with LJ tabulated potential. I followed the instructions on the manual, and I did well because my .xvg file of Lenn

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials - cutoff

2014-05-06 Thread Sabine Reisser
Thanks for pointing me to this, this could actually work. Cheers Sabine Am 05.05.2014 16:05, schrieb Mark Abraham: I've no idea whether PME-User (read its description!) and enerygrp-table interact in a way useful to you, but it might. You were going to test whether your implementation of your

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials - cutoff

2014-05-05 Thread Mark Abraham
I've no idea whether PME-User (read its description!) and enerygrp-table interact in a way useful to you, but it might. You were going to test whether your implementation of your model was working correctly anyway, right? ;-) Mark On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sabine Reisser wrote: > But I ca

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials - cutoff

2014-05-05 Thread Sabine Reisser
But I cannot have specific interactions between two groups and normal PME for the rest, right? Cheers Sabine Am 05.05.2014 10:41, schrieb Mark Abraham: On May 5, 2014 10:01 AM, "Sabine Reisser" wrote: So that means the electrostatics are calculated as given in the tables and no long range

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials - cutoff

2014-05-05 Thread Mark Abraham
On May 5, 2014 10:01 AM, "Sabine Reisser" wrote: > > So that means the electrostatics are calculated as given in the tables and no long range electrostatics corrections (like PME or RF) are applied? Correct. The .mdp settings determine what interactions are computed; the table just says the value

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials - cutoff

2014-05-05 Thread Sabine Reisser
So that means the electrostatics are calculated as given in the tables and no long range electrostatics corrections (like PME or RF) are applied? Cheers Sabine Am 28.04.2014 18:28, schrieb Justin Lemkul: On 4/28/14, 9:19 AM, Sabine Reisser wrote: Hi, I'm using tabulated potentials to creat

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials - cutoff

2014-04-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 4/28/14, 9:19 AM, Sabine Reisser wrote: Hi, I'm using tabulated potentials to create a hole in a membrane. I define three groups: 2 dummy-atoms, all hydrophobic lipid chains, and rest. For the interactions between the dummy atoms and the hydrophobic chains I define an exclusively repulsive

[gmx-users] tabulated potentials - cutoff

2014-04-28 Thread Sabine Reisser
Hi, I'm using tabulated potentials to create a hole in a membrane. I define three groups: 2 dummy-atoms, all hydrophobic lipid chains, and rest. For the interactions between the dummy atoms and the hydrophobic chains I define an exclusively repulsive potential. All other interactions are defi

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials on GPU?

2014-01-21 Thread Szilárd Páll
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > Tabulated, yes. With all algorithms, who knows? Tabulated non-bondeds on > GPU, I highly doubt. GPUs are for computing, not looking up random-access > tables. Actually, the CUDA Ewald non-bonded kernels are tabulated on Fermi GPUs - the textu

Re: [gmx-users] tabulated potentials on GPU?

2014-01-21 Thread Mark Abraham
Tabulated, yes. With all algorithms, who knows? Tabulated non-bondeds on GPU, I highly doubt. GPUs are for computing, not looking up random-access tables. Mark On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Steven Neumann wrote: > Dear Gromacs Users, > > Can you please write me whther Gromacs 4.6 support tab

[gmx-users] tabulated potentials on GPU?

2014-01-21 Thread Steven Neumann
Dear Gromacs Users, Can you please write me whther Gromacs 4.6 support tabulated potentials for bonded and non-bonded interactions? Steven -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Rea