Re: [gmx-users] hbond error

2017-02-16 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/16/17 9:17 AM, Mark Abraham wrote: Hi, Great. To check that I understand you, do you think it should it read "Ordering is the reverse of that in -hbn index file?" While this has been a point of confusion in the past, I think we have to be careful with the wording here. The ordering o

Re: [gmx-users] hbond error

2017-02-16 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Great. To check that I understand you, do you think it should it read "Ordering is the reverse of that in -hbn index file?" Mark On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:32 PM wrote: > Hi, > > I just realized that the hbond tool works fine, but produces output in > reverse order. The "bug" is in the manu

Re: [gmx-users] hbond error

2017-02-16 Thread chiara . parravicini
Hi, I just realized that the hbond tool works fine, but produces output in reverse order. The "bug" is in the manual that states: * -hbm: existence matrix for all hydrogen bonds over all frames, this also contains information on solvent insertion into hydrogen bonds. Ordering is ide

Re: [gmx-users] hbond error

2017-02-16 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, I'm not sure whether I properly understand your description of the behaviour. But if you think you have a case where the tool doesn't do what its documentation says, please open an issue at https://redmine.gromacs.org and attach a tarball of files that will help us diagnose and fix it :-) Mar

[gmx-users] hbond error

2017-02-16 Thread Chiara Parravicini
Dear Gmx users, using GROMACS version 2016.1, I found the following error in the output of the gmx hbond routine: when computed from different groups, where one is a subset of the other one, hbonds from the same acceptor/donor pair do not match. I known that this error has been already widely d