Hi,
Leave the rtp the way it was and name the residue in the pdb file so that
it matches. Then you won't have to teach pdb2gmx that your newly invented
residue is protein
Mark
On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 05:51 Neena Susan Eappen, <
neena.susaneap...@mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> Hi GMX users,
>
>
>
Hi,
Why is your residue numbering and residue naming changing in mutually
inconsistent ways?
Mark
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:36 AM bharat gupta
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to build the toplogy for cellopentoase using the newly
> derived parameters mentioned in
Hi,
I have been trying to build the toplogy for cellopentoase using the newly
derived parameters mentioned in this paper:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21387332. I got the paper from the
gromacs website:
http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/200/=56a_CARBO4GROMACS.rar
When I try to
On 5/13/16 11:04 AM, Irem Altan wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply. Erasing the dihedral with CB worked. I’m actually
using Gromacs 5.1.2.
Not sure how that's possible. It should have been fixed prior to the release of
5.1.1.
-Justin
Best,
Irem
On May 13, 2016, at 10:52 AM,
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply. Erasing the dihedral with CB worked. I’m actually
using Gromacs 5.1.2.
Best,
Irem
> On May 13, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/13/16 10:49 AM, Irem Altan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a .pdb file that I’ve used in
On 5/13/16 10:49 AM, Irem Altan wrote:
Hi,
I have a .pdb file that I’ve used in simulations with amber99sb before. I have
recently switched to amber03. When I do pdb2gmx, I get the following warning:
WARNING: WARNING: Residue 26 named GLY of a molecule in the input file was
mapped
to an
Indeed Justin I have tried to add the entries for the capped groups in the
Amber99SB-ILDN force field (like in the charmm*.ff) since they are not present
in aminoacids.n.tdb and aminoacids.c.tdb, so I think I have broken
something
Stéphane
On 4/5/16 6:47 AM, ABEL Stephane 175950
On 4/5/16 6:47 AM, ABEL Stephane 175950 wrote:
Hello,
When i use pdb2gmx (v.504) and 12 AA long peptide with the Amber99SB-ILDN force
field, I have the error :
Fatal error:
tpA = 53191, i= 0 in print_atoms
I have no idea what does this message mean. Could you help me?
This shouldn't
On 10/15/15 4:18 AM, Dries Van Rompaey wrote:
I did some more testing, it seems that this only occurs when the PRO
residue is preceded by a glycine. Could this be related to this issue:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.gromacs.user/72687 ? When I
change the glycine residue to
I did some more testing, it seems that this only occurs when the PRO
residue is preceded by a glycine. Could this be related to this issue:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.gromacs.user/72687 ? When I
change the glycine residue to anything else, pdb2gmx works like a charm. I
On 10/8/15 1:54 AM, Dries Van Rompaey wrote:
Thanks for the reply Justin. I unfortunately cannot currently disclose the
files that I'm working on. Based on the info presented, would you say that
it's an issue with the force field definition or with the actual protein
topology? I am not
On 10/7/15 3:01 PM, Dries Van Rompaey wrote:
Hi Mark,
This is Gromacs 5.0.4. This is a non-terminal residue.
The command line used is:
gmx pdb2gmx -f complex.pdb -o complex.gro (-ignh)
I tried this procedure with and without ignh flag.
As far as I know, specbonds is not in play.
Thanks Justin, that makes sense! I'm wondering why none of the other
proline residues triggered that warning though? The same procedure works
like a charm with other proteins.
On 7 Oct 2015 10:59 pm, "Justin Lemkul" wrote:
>
>
> On 10/7/15 3:01 PM, Dries Van Rompaey wrote:
>
>>
On 10/7/15 5:03 PM, Dries Van Rompaey wrote:
Thanks Justin, that makes sense! I'm wondering why none of the other
proline residues triggered that warning though? The same procedure works
like a charm with other proteins.
Without access to all of the files you're looking at, the best I can do
Hi,
Is it terminal? Are there specbonds in play? What's the GROMACS version?
What's your pdb2gmx command line? :-)
Mark
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:43 PM Dries Van Rompaey
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm getting the following warning when I try to run pdb2gmx on my
On 7/26/15 6:46 AM, faride badalkhani wrote:
Dear all,
could anybody help me at this error?
Fatal error:
atom N not found in buiding block 1AMC while combining tdb and rtp
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at
...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of su
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:26 PM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue
topology database
How you converted the gaussian file into .pdb? Because once i did the same
and suffered from some missing co
...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of su
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:26 PM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue not found in residue topology
database
How you converted the gaussian file into .pdb? Because once i did the same
and suffered from some missing co
I never did that.
-Original Message-
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se
[mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of su
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:26 PM
To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx error residue
On 7/8/15 6:39 AM, anu chandra wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to use pdb2gmx tool to generate topology for my membrane
protein system with chamrm36 force field. I have downloaded Gromacs
compatible Chamrmm36ff from
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/charmm_ff.shtml#gromacs. I build the
If I got it right I would suggest this. Try removing parts in your overall
structure.
For example let's say your system has 3 components water, ATP, TPO. Try
removing all but water, try pdb2gmx, all but ATP ( like a sim in vacuo ) try
once again pdb2gmx. This will make the troubled part
Thanks Justin. Its working fine.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote:
On 7/8/15 6:39 AM, anu chandra wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to use pdb2gmx tool to generate topology for my membrane
protein system with chamrm36 force field. I have
Look at the file: residuetypes.dat in the ../top/ directory of your
installation.
It lists all the residue names and more.
Peter Stern
Weizmann Institute
Sent from my iPad
On 8 ביולי 2015, at 17:45, Hamisu Aliyu Mohd hamisu.kaza...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear gmx-users,
I am really new in
How you converted the gaussian file into .pdb? Because once i did the same and
suffered from some missing co ordinates.
Sent from my iPhone
On 08-Jul-2015, at 11:16 pm, Peter Stern peter.st...@weizmann.ac.il wrote:
Look at the file: residuetypes.dat in the ../top/ directory of your
On 4/7/15 7:53 AM, Sneha Menon wrote:
Dear all,
I want to simulate a polymer - triphenylphosphine connected to a
polyethylene glycol polymer using the CHARMM36 forcefield. I obtained the
parameters of this polymer (resname TPP) using SwissParam. I added this
molecule to the forcefield by
Hi,
These errors mean exactly what they say. There's a mismatch between your
structure file and the residue structure in the database. So you need to
look at them both and see what is wrong. Chapter 5 of the manual is your
friend.
Mark
On 19/03/2015 3:17 am, RJ ra...@kaist.ac.kr wrote:
Dear
26 matches
Mail list logo