On 10/12/18 3:23 AM, Rakesh Mishra wrote:
Dear Justin .
Thanks for your response. And yes of course google is best friend for all.
"distance" method requires Y/N, whereas the "direction" method requires
a vector."
But , "direction" method (where vector needs to define ) also gives the
same
Dear Justin .
Thanks for your response. And yes of course google is best friend for all.
"distance" method requires Y/N, whereas the "direction" method requires
a vector."
But , "direction" method (where vector needs to define ) also gives the
same result
as we obtain the result in case of
On 10/8/18 3:22 AM, Rakesh Mishra wrote:
Dear Dr. Justin
Thanks for your patience to reply me. I think for last 3-4 months
we are discussing about the pulling. I agreed with your statement to
[stop thinking concretely in terms of a "reference" and a
"pulled" group ]. I am also not
Dear Dr. Justin
Thanks for your patience to reply me. I think for last 3-4 months
we are discussing about the pulling. I agreed with your statement to
[stop thinking concretely in terms of a "reference" and a
"pulled" group ]. I am also not thinking in terms of this nomenclature.
I just
On 10/5/18 12:47 AM, Rakesh Mishra wrote:
Dear Justin thanks for ur reply.
Which means in this case,both group will act as a reference group for each
other.
Then now my question is, why without using two biasing potential, in case
of using one
biasing potential for two group, If I do not
Dear Justin thanks for ur reply.
Which means in this case,both group will act as a reference group for each
other.
Then now my question is, why without using two biasing potential, in case
of using one
biasing potential for two group, If I do not constrained reference group
then it automatically
On 10/4/18 3:09 AM, Rakesh Mishra wrote:
Dear all.
How it is possible to pull reference group as well as pull group using
gromacs protocol simultaneously in opposite direction using umbrella
protocol
of pulling. So far non of the Gromacs expertise have given the answer of
this question.
