Dear all,
On 4/3/2023 9:37 AM, Luuk Hendriks wrote:
Hi all,
I support adoption, this concept would offer very useful insights in
both troubleshooting and general analysis of router behaviours.
+1 for the exact same reasons.
Regards, Benoit
Best,
luuk
On Thu 30 Mar 2023, 04:35, Job
Dear all,
On 5/8/2023 1:17 PM, Jean Quilbeuf wrote:
Dear All,
I support the adoption of this draft because the visibility of the paths status
will improve both manual troubleshooting and also later automation of the
closed-loop.
+1 for the exact same reasons.
Regards, B.
Best,
Jean
Dear all,
I specifically appreciate the reuse of the IPFIX PEN mechanism, which
facilitates an efficient a collection system for combined data and
control plane monitoring. Hence support.
Regards, Benoit
On 4/13/2022 3:51 AM, Zhuangshunwan wrote:
Hi GROW WG,
I have read this document and
Hi Tom,
Great feedback.
I would like to come back your NACM comment below.
We added "nacm:default-deny-all" to our action (in our temp version).
I have not been following the detailed history of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-13. And I
don't know whether this
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Thanks for addressing my comment.
Regards, B.
Thu, May 11, 2017 at 05:19:53AM -0700, Benoit Claise:
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-grow-bmp-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
On 10/18/2015 10:46 PM, Rob Shakir wrote:
Hi Benoit, John,
Whilst not claiming to be a NETCONF expert, I have spent significant time with
the BGP modelling work, so let me add some points.
On October 15, 2015 at 14:22:12, John G. Scudder (j...@juniper.net) wrote:
This DISCUSS is in line with
Jeff,
Benoit,
To add to some of Rob's observations:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 02:46:58PM -0600, Rob Shakir wrote:
However, we need to consider how wide-ranging this discussion might end up
being, and what the implications elsewhere might be. Let’s take a very simple
example of the Per-Peer
Thanks John,
Regards, Benoit
Hi Benoit,
Thanks for your comments. I'll follow up on your discuss by and by, likely it
will be most convenient to huddle with the other authors in Yokohama. Other
comments in-line below.
On Oct 15, 2015, at 6:10 AM, Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com>
11 matches
Mail list logo
