Dear all,
On 4/3/2023 9:37 AM, Luuk Hendriks wrote:
Hi all,
I support adoption, this concept would offer very useful insights in
both troubleshooting and general analysis of router behaviours.
+1 for the exact same reasons.
Regards, Benoit
Best,
luuk
On Thu 30 Mar 2023, 04:35, Job Snijders wrote:
Dear GROW,
The authors of draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv asked whether GROW
working group could consider adoption of the internet-draft.
This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this
internet-draft should be adopted.
Title: BMP Extension for Path Status TLV
Abstract:
The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining
BGP Path information. BGP Path Information is conveyed within BMP Route
Monitoring (RM) messages. This document proposes an extension to BMP to
convey the status of a path after being processed by the BGP process.
This extension makes use of the TLV mechanims described in
draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv and draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit.
The Internet-Draft can be found here:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-12.html
Please share with the mailing list if you are think this work should be
adopted by GROW, willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to this
draft!
WG Adoption call ends April 21th, 2023.
Kind regards,
Job / Chris
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
