Re: [GROW] is TCP the right layer for BMP session resumption?

On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 20:44:18 + "Jakob Heitz \(jheitz\)" wrote: > I've seen this session resumption technique in the '90s. > BMP is a one-way protocol. The BMP server sends nothing. I kind of wish my BMP router monitor was able to transport data over UDP to the listening station like syslog

Re: [GROW] Limiting AS path length?

On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:21:08 + Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > Dear Global Routing Operators, And medium-size academic netop. > My question: is rejecting excessively long AS paths something we want > to do? It is something I've decided to do. When I looked at the paths we were getting a

Re: [GROW] Last Call: (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:31:17 + joel jaeggli wrote: > It's not clear to me how that would even work. assuming for the sake > of arguement that the IXP by way of configured policy on the > route-server adds this community to a prefix. Here is some detail on how DE-CIX

Re: [GROW] ISC Response to draft-ietf-grow-unique-origin-as

On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:07:06 + Leo Bicknell bickn...@isc.org wrote: time. I think the question is if anyone else on the list cares one way or another, because if no other opinions have been changed we might as well stop. I often play contrarian or skeptic, if not an honest critic when I

Re: [GROW] last call for draft-ietf-grow-unique-origin-as-00

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:54:55 +0800 Peter Schoenmaker p...@lugs.com wrote: Please review the draft and provide any last comments. My thanks to Danny for prodding me to review it and comment. There are a handful of spelling mistakes and some words that are if not found in the OED, are at least