> given that they're a shrinking rarity, would it not make sense to
> completely exclude non-transparent RSs from the ASPA definition? In
> the short term this would cause problems for ASNs which connect to
> non-transparent RSs, but there are hardly any left, and only one
> sizeable one.
>
> I
Ben Maddison wrote on 11/03/2022 07:23:
Essential, I would think: how could a far end relying party know that an
AS in the middle of a received AS_PATH is a non-transparent IXP RS in
order to apply any other treatment?
given that they're a shrinking rarity, would it not make sense to
